Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

CITRUS PLACELicense 331880924
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on the information gathered during the investigation the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, facility is overcooking residents food, revealed the following. LPA and the Executive Chef toured the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed a 2 day perishable and a 7 day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen staff preparing lunch, LPA observed meals being served to residents in the assisted living dining room. 12 out of 12 residents interviewed reported they enjoyed lunch, and it was not overcooked. !2 out of 12 residents interviewed reported they have not been served overcooked food. The Executive Chef reported that standard restaurant practices are used and the quality of the food is checked at each meal and none of the food served to residents is overcooked. 3 out of 3 kitchen staff interviewed reported that none of the food is overcooked. None of the evidence gathered corroborates the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed, unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, facility is serving food to residents that is not of qualify, revealed the following. LPA and the Executive Chef toured the kitchen. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed a 2 day perishable and a 7 day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. LPA observed the refrigerator and freezer are kept at the required temperature. LPA observed the kitchen staff preparing lunch, LPA observed meals being served to residents in the assisted living dining room. 12 out of 12 residents interviewed reported they enjoyed lunch, and it was not overcooked. 8 out of 12 residents interviewed reported they like the food and have no issues with the food. 4 out of 12 residents reported they would like a bigger selection of food and thought the food could be a little better, but still enjoyed the food. The Executive Chef reported that standard restaurant practices are used, and the quality of the food is checked at each meal and all of the food served to residents is of good quality. 3 out of 3 kitchen staff interviewed reported that the food served is of good quality. The Executive Chef reported that the facility gets the food from a food distribution company and a produce company, deliveries arrive 3 days a week. The Executive Chef reported only quality ingredients are used to prepare the meals. None of the evidence gathered corroborates the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed, unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, facility does not ensure that an adequate amount of food is available to residents, revealed the following. LPA observed breakfast and lunch being served to residents. LPA observed kitchen staff preparing lunch for residents. LPA observed in the bistro next to the dining room a counter with ice water and fresh fruit available to residents. The Executive Chef reported that the fresh fruit and water is available from 7 am to 7 pm. The Executive Chef reported that from breakfast time until 7 pm kitchen staff are available and will prepare food for any resident upon request. 3 out of 3 staff interviewed reported that some residents will order food in between scheduled mealtimes but only around once a week. 12 out of 12 residents interviewed reported they are given enough food and have no issues with getting snacks in between meals. LPA observed all meals being served are on a standard 9-inch plate. LPA observed all the meals served at breakfast and lunch had a full plate. For breakfast residents had the choice of eggs prepared any style along with choice of breakfast meat and toast or hot or cold cereal. For lunch residents had a choice of Swiss steak or chicken along with mashed potatoes and vegetables. For lunch a cup of soup or salad was served along with the entrée. Residents have their choice of beverage. None of the evidence gathered corroborates the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed, unsubstantiated, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Safe, healthful, comfortable accommodations

    Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews conducted and record review, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was provided safe and healthful accommodations. R1 remained in the resident's room while a substantial repair was being done.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Maintain facility in clean, safe, sanitary condition

    The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and record review, the Licensee failed to ensure facility was safe and in good repair. Facility had an ongoing issue with ceiling leaks in R1's room. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • Facility maintenance and healthful environment

    The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities:The premises shall be maintained in a state of good repair and shall provide a safe and healthful environment. This req is not being met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure R1's room was safe and healthful. Facility documentation indicates an issue with water being inside the light sockets in R1's room. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 19, 2024 inspection of CITRUS PLACE?

This was a complaint inspection of CITRUS PLACE on November 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CITRUS PLACE on November 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.