Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ST. PAUL'S TOWERSLicense 0114006272 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

...continued from LIC9099. Facility staff financially abused residents in care. On 08/16/24, S2 reported to the Oakland Police Department (OPD) that Witness #4 (W4) had a check taken from her apartment and fraudulently written on 08/05/24 and cashed on 08/12/24. On 08/30/24, S2 reported a second incident to OPD. S1 shared with S2 that Resident #3 (R3’s) check was stole, cashed and written by S4; a third and same incident occurred with R4. On 09/08/24, W3 emailed Staff (S2, S3, S5, S6) to alert them that he/she had discovered checks were stolen from R1 and had been cashed by W4 per the signatures. On 09/13/24, S2 reported to OPD that R5 discovered a check had been written against his/her account on 09/05/24. S2 reported to OPD and LPA that S5 was able to identify S4 from the merchant’s camera footage. A series on fraudulent incidents continued to occur affecting but not limited to R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, & R13. S7 reported that the Executive Director advised him/her to suspend all investigation measures and that Regional Human Resources would be taking over. S3 confirmed that W4 no longer worked at the facility as of 09/24/24. Facility staff did not notify residents' and their authorized representatives of incident. After LPA investigated the allegation f acility staff financially abused residents in care, interviews with S1, S2 and records reviewed revealed that the ED did not inform all of the St. Paul Tower residents of financial abuse amongst residents until 09/26/24 and LPA confirmed from S1 during the visit that the RPs were informed via an emailed memo on 10/11/2024. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are SUBSTANTIATED . Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights provided to Cherry Marcelo, S1.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(10)Type B

    1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (10) To be free from...financial exploitation...punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical ... - This requirement is not met as evidence by: -Based on records reviewed and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above once staff financially abused residents which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following. (1) A written report … to the person responsible for the resident within seven days … (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident …-This requirement is not met as evidence by: which threatens the welfare, safety or health …-This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on records reviewed and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above when ED did not report the financial abuse incidents to all residents within seven days which poses/posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 24, 2025 inspection of ST. PAUL'S TOWERS?

This was a complaint inspection of ST. PAUL'S TOWERS on January 24, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ST. PAUL'S TOWERS on January 24, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.