Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099. Allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident in care. Finding: Unsubstantiated Based on interviews with staff and W1 revealed that R1 receives monthly income from Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and the remaining income was provided by the family. Interview with complainant indicated that R1 was being charged private room rate when R1 did not request to be in a private room. There was a lack of evidence that licensee is financially abusing R1. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Dolly Rizvi and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.655(a)Type B

    1569.655 Increase in fee rates for elderly residents; 90 days’ written notice...(a) If a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly increases the rates of fees for residents or makes increases in any of its rate structures for services, the licensee shall provide no less than 90 days’ prior written notice to the residents or the residents’ representatives... This requirement is not met as evidience by: Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not providing 90 days written notice for increase rate which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

  • 87224(a)(4)Type B

    Eviction Procedures. (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed... (4) If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified and a reappraisal has been conducted pursuant to Section 87463, and the licensee and the person who performs the reappraisal believe that the facility is not appropriate for the resident. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not providing an explanation in the eviction notice which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 29, 2025 inspection of MARYMOUNT VILLA RETIREMENT CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of MARYMOUNT VILLA RETIREMENT CENTER on December 29, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MARYMOUNT VILLA RETIREMENT CENTER on December 29, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.