complaint·September 7, 2023

Continued from Lic9099. It was alleged that: Licensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident. Based on interviews and record review conducted, LPA confirmed with S1 and S2 that R1 was unsafe for the community and R1 needed a higher level of care. S1 and S2 notified Rp about R1’s aggressive behavior and that R1 is a harm to herself, staff and other residents in the community. It was stated by S1 and S2 that R1 did not receive an eviction notice, and that S1 and S2 verbally informed Rp that the community can not meet R1's care needs. Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted with ADM, and a copy of this report provided along with appeal rights. Continued from Lic9099. It was alleged that: Facility staff did not properly supervise resident resulting in elopement. Based on interviews conducted, S1, S3, and S4 were supervising R1 while R1 left the facility. Staff did not want to force R1 to come back into the facility and staff walked with R1 to food max store while 911 was called. Rp was informed that R1 left the facility. Rp arrived too food max store and drove S1 and R1 back to the community. No police report was generated. Based on Interviews conducted, Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted with ADM, and a copy of this report provided.