Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITYLicense 0192005092 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged resident was left in wet diapers for extended periods of time and staff failed to meet resident's hygiene needs . However, based on interview with 3 of 5 staff, R1's hospice agency conducts visit daily and assist R1 with toileting and dressing. S4 and S5 stated that two rounds are conducted per shift. LPA discovered during an interview with S4 and S5 that residents who are under hospice are also changed as needed by caregivers. It was alleged resident was not adequately fed while in care. On 1/16/2023, LPA L. Fontanilla reviewed R1’s hospice notes from April 2021 to August 2021. Based on records reviewed, R1 had a fair appetite. R1 preferred to pick own food and refused assistance from staff with meals. Notes also indicate that R1 was consuming 30-50% 3 times a day. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Assistant Executive Director. It was alleged staff failed to administer resident’s medication as prescribed . On 01/25/2023, LPA L. Fontanilla obtained and reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 2019-2020 and Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR). R1 had an order for Donepezil (Aricept) 10 mg 1 tablet by mouth daily in the morning and ½ tablet (25mg) by mouth after lunch. A review of R1’s MAR for 5/23/2021-6/22/2021 shows an encircled initial of the staff person giving medication from 5/30/2021 till 6/22/2021. Upon verification made by LPA L. Fontanilla with Robert Roby, the code facility uses if a resident refuses to take medication is the staff person’s initial with a circle around it. Based on records reviewed, R1 did not get Donepezil from 5/20/2021-6/22/2021. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided to Assistant Executive Director.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(10)Type A

    §1569.269(a)(10) Enumerated rights; severability(10) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, Licensee did not comply with the regulation cited above. R1 sustained one Stage 2 coccyx pressure ulcer and one Stage 1 pressure injury on right hip which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(5)Type A

    87465(a)(5) Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility.....(5) Facility staff, except those authorized by law, shall not administer injections, but staff designated by the licensee may assist persons with self-administration as needed. Assistance with self-administered medications…. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the Licensee did not comply with the regulations cited above when R1 was not given Donepezil from 5/30/2021 to 6/22/2021 which poses an immediate health and safety risk residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 2, 2023 inspection of PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY?

This was a complaint inspection of PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY on February 2, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY on February 2, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "§1569.269(a)(10) Enumerated rights; severability(10) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclus..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.