Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff are not properly trained to administer medications - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was alleged that the Staff are not properly trained to administer medications. However, during the investigation, LPAs reviewed the Med Tech schedule for May, June, and July 2024. S2, S7, S8, and S9 were scheduled as Med Tech during May, June, and July 2024. The record reviewed shows that S2, S7, S8, and S9 have all completed their training on record. Allegation: Lack of supervision resulting in resident sustaining a fall - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was alleged that the facility lacks supervision, resulting in a resident sustaining a fall. During the investigation, LPAs reviewed the R2 physician report, R2 assessment, the time R2 moved in and after the sudden fall. At the time of the incident, R2 was receiving appropriate supervision according to the R2 assessment. R2 assessment dated 12/17/2023 – 5/23/2024 shows R2 ambulates independently. R2 had a sudden fall on 6/24/2024 facility updated R2's needs and services plan after the fall, dated 6/25/2024, indicated that R2 will be checked every two hours before and after bedtime on going. Allegation: Facility is not ensuring a staff is on duty on the premises overnight- UNSUBSTANTIATED It was alleged that the facility is not ensuring a staff in on duty on the premises overnight. During the investigation, LPAs reviewed the staff schedule for May 2024 to the current shows the facility has staff on duty on the premises overnight. LPAs conducted staff and resident interview confirmed that there are staff on duty on the premises overnight. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87309(a)Type A

    Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having unlocked prescription of topical cream in R1's room which poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87463(h)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having updated medical assessment for residents in care which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87555(b)(8)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not properly storing and labeling food which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 14, 2025 inspection of PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY?

This was a complaint inspection of PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY on July 14, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING UNION CITY on July 14, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.