Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

SCOTT VILLALicense 019200750
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo arrived unaanounced to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Jonabelle Tolentino, administrator, and informed the reason for visit. It was alleged that resident's (R1) roommate was wearing R1's jewelry and does not know if the jewelry was stolen or a coincidence that the roommate has it. LPA interviewed R1 who stated the roommate was R1's roommate in the previous private residence where R1 left the jewelries. Based on information provided by R1 that the jewelries and roommate are not in the facility, which the Department does not have jurisdiction, the allegation is closed as unfounded. An unfounded finding means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiency cited. Exit interviewed conducted, and copy fof this report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in quantity of all of R1's 9 medications received by the facility does not match the quantity listed on LIC622 which poses/posed a potential health and/or personal rights risk to person in care.

  • 87705(f)(1)Type A

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in razor in R5's ensuite toilet which poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above iin missing drawers and drawer knob in R5's room which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 10, 2024 inspection of SCOTT VILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of SCOTT VILLA on May 10, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SCOTT VILLA on May 10, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.