Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

ELDER ASHRAMLicense 0192009561 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 8/26/2022 at 10:40 a.m., Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) C. Lin and J. Sampair conducted case management while conducting a complaint investigation, met with Wellness Director and explained the purpose of visit. Upon entry, LPAs observed staff S1 walked from the hallway, spoke with residents and staff without wearing face mask. Approximately 30 minutes later, LPAs observe another staff S2 walked to the conference room where LPAs were didn't wear face mask. Facility had 2 positive Covid-19 cases for residents on 8/15/22 and are still under monitoring by CCL and Alameda Public Health. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations. A repeated deficiency civil penalty $250 is assessed today. Exit interview was conducted with Wellness Director, LIC809D, LIC421FC, Appeal Rights, and a copy of report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall....(2) To be accorded safe, healthful....This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, two staff were observed not wearing face mask in the facility which poses an potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87224(d)Type B

    87224 Eviction Procedures(d)The licensee shall set forth in the notice to quit the reasons relied upon for the eviction with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning those reasons.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section above when 30-day eviction was issued for R1 which posed a potential personal rights risk to person in care.

  • 87224(d)(1)(A)Type B

    87224 Eviction Procedures(d)The licensee shall set forth in the notice...(1)The notice to quit shall include...(A)The effective date of the eviction.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section above when 30-day eviction was issued for R1 which posed a potential personal rights risk to person in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 26, 2022 inspection of ELDER ASHRAM?

This was a other inspection of ELDER ASHRAM on August 26, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ELDER ASHRAM on August 26, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.