Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CAREFIELD PLEASANTONLicense 0192010391 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Resident suffered multiple falls resulting in injuries . Interview with staff revealed that R1 had six falls while living at the facility in which four falls resulted in injuries or minor injuries. However, after R1’s fall on 5/22/2022, the facility raised R1’s level of care from a two to a four which increased resident checks to eight times, R1 is checked every 30 minutes due to fall risk, and fall alarms was installed in R1’s room. Resident was not provided assistance with toileting needs Interview with staff indicated that toileting needs are checked at least every 2 hours. Staff have not witnessed resident's toileting needs were not met. Resident was not provided assistance with showering . Interview with staff revealed that R1 would sometimes refuse showers and staff come back at a later time to assist R1 with showers. Staff stated when a resident refused showers, it would be documented on the progress notes. Inadequate staffing to meet the needs of the residents in care . LPA reviewed staff scheduled and observed AM shift have 4-5 caregivers and 1 med tech, PM shift have 4 caregivers and 1 med tech, and NOC shift have 2 caregivers and 1 med tech. Interview with staff revealed that besides the caregivers and med techs, a manager is on duty for both AM and PM shift seven days a week. Staff did not respond to resident's call bell . LPA reviewed a sample of resident's pull cord records and observed pull cord incidents from R1 were responded by facility staff. Resident cannot easily use pull cord . LPA observed R4 demonstrated how to pulled on the pull cord beside the bed and was able to pull the pull cord. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided. Based on LPA's information obtained during investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(c)(2)Type A

    Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having a bottle of Acetaminophen 325mg when doctor's order was for Acetaminophen 1000mg which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87609(b)(4)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above not having a home health agency written agreement which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)Type B

    Reporting Requirements. A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on investigation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not reporting all of R1's falls which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

  • 87217(b)Type B

    Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables. Every facility shall take appropriate measures to safeguard residents' cash resources, personal property and valuables which have been entrusted to the licensee or facility staff... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on investigation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not safeguarding resident's belongings which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 29, 2023 inspection of CAREFIELD PLEASANTON?

This was a complaint inspection of CAREFIELD PLEASANTON on September 29, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CAREFIELD PLEASANTON on September 29, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having a bottle of A..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.