Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EMERALD VALLEYLicense 0192011671 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

***CONTINUE FROM 9099*** LPA also conducted interviews with two residents (R1 and R2). Both residents stated that they are satisfied with the cleanliness of their apartments and reported that they frequently observe housekeeping staff maintaining the apartment, dining area, and common areas in a sanitary condition. This agency has investigated the allegation above. We have found that the allegation was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided. ***CONTINUE FROM 9099*** The LPA also observed soiled cooking equipment, including grills and stove tops with accumulated grease and food debris, which posed a risk of cross-contamination. Based on LPA's observation and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeals rights provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87555(b)Type B

    87555(b) The following food service requirements shall apply:...(9) Procedures which protect the safety, acceptability and nutritive values of food shall be observed in food storage, preparation and service....(27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Based on observation and records review, the kitchen was observed to have food items stored uncovered, raw food stored in close proxitimity to read to eat foods, and cooking equipment heavily soiled with grease and food debris which pos a potential health and safety risk to residents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 30, 2026 inspection of EMERALD VALLEY?

This was a complaint inspection of EMERALD VALLEY on January 30, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to EMERALD VALLEY on January 30, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87555(b) The following food service requirements shall apply:...(9) Procedures which protect the safety, acceptability a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.