Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LINCOLN VILLALicense 0192014952 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099... Allegation: Staff do not ensure that an appropriately skilled professional performs resident's glucose tests. It was alleged that staff do not ensure that an appropriately skilled professional performs resident's glucose tests. Interview with 4 of 5 staff members stated that only skilled professionals are the ones performing the glucose test. Interview with ADM stated that there are nurses that work 7 days a week until 10:30 PM that can perform the glucose test and assist with other duties. However, interviews with 4 of 7 residents all stated that aside from the nurses, S2 or S4 will do the glucose tests for them. Based on record review, S2 and S4 are not skilled professionals and are not able to perform glucose monitoring tests. Based on interviews and record review conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medication. It was alleged that Staff did not assist resident with obtaining medication. A review of email correspondence showed that Family Member 1 (FM1) sent an email to the facility’s email address that R1’s medication was ready on 04/17/2026. FM1 sent a follow email on 04/21/2026 and 04/23/2026 to see if the medication was picked up. Interview with ADM revealed that a staff member picked up the medication on Thursday, 04/23/2026. Interview with S4 showed that S4 talked to FM1 regarding the medication ready to be picked up at the pharmacy, but S4 did not pick it up until the following day. During today’s visit, LPA observed the medication bottle with a note that it was started on 04/23/2026. Based on interviews and record review conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights was provided. Continued from LIC9099-A... Allegation: Staff do not follow resident's dietary plan. It was alleged that staff do not follow resident's dietary plan. Interview with S3 revealed that S3 has a list in the kitchen of residents who are on special diets. During today’s visit, LPA observed that the kitchen has different plates for residents that is specified to their special diet. Interview with 4 of 7 residents all stated that they are receiving meals that are specific to their dietary plan that can include either low sugar, low sodium, or lactose free diets. Interview with 7 of 7 residents all indicated that they have no issues with the food that are being served to them. Based on interviews and observations conducted, the above allegation that staff do not follow resident’s dietary plan is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. There is no deficiency noted. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(1)Type B

    87465(a)(1) Incidental Medical and Dental Care(1)The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not picking up the resident’s medication when it was ready for pick up which posed a potential safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87628(a)Type B

    87628(a)Diabetes(a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is able to perform his/her own glucose testing...or has it administered by an appropriately skilled professional.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having staff who are not skilled professionals assisting residents with glucose testing which poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 30, 2026 inspection of LINCOLN VILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of LINCOLN VILLA on April 30, 2026. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LINCOLN VILLA on April 30, 2026?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465(a)(1) Incidental Medical and Dental Care(1)The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and den..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.