Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MARBELLA OROVILLELicense 0450006031 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff were not aware that a resident had eloped from the facility. – SUBSTANTIATED. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) eloped from the facility's memory care unit. Staff were not aware that R1 was missing from the facility until R1’s family came to the facility to visit R1 and R1 could not be located at the facility by staff. R1 was found a substantial distance from the facility and was returned to the facility by a community member. Staff interviews revealed that staff were made aware that R1 had eloped when R1's family came to the facility to visit R1 and R1 was not in the memory care unit. There were two PCAs on duty in the memory care unit and one Med Tech was floating between the assisted living side of the facility and the memory care unit. No one witnessed R1 eloping. Some staff thought that R1 could have eloped through the garden gate but the gate was latched from the inside when staff checked after it was discovered that R1 had eloped. Some staff thought that R1 may have eloped through the front doors of the memory care unit. Staff did not know how R1 had eloped from the facility. Executive Director (ED) stated the last time R1 was seen was at about 2:00 PM and R1 was brought back to the facility at around 3:30 PM. ED stated that the surveillance cameras had malfunctioned during the time that R1 had eloped and therefore there was no surveillance footage for LPA to review to determine whether R1 had eloped through the front doors of the memory care unit. It was determined that R1 eloped from the facility without staff being aware and was out of the facility for about 1.5 hours, unknown to staff. It is unknown how R1 eloped from the facility, there were no witnesses. This allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted and the report was provided to Executive Director Sonya Gonzales.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87705Type A

    87705(a)(c)(4) Care of Persons with Dementia (a) This section applies to licensees who accept or retain residents diagnosed by a physician to have dementia. Mild cognitive impairment, as defined in Section 87101(m), is not considered to be dementia. (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety and health care needs as identified in his/her current appraisal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interviews, the licensee failed to ensure that there were sufficient staff present to provide supervision to residents to ensure that no residents eloped from the facility. As a result, R1 eloped from the facility and was found a substantial distance from the facility by a community member and was returned to the facility. Staff were not aware that R1 had eloped until R1’s family came to visit them and R1 was not present at the facility. This poses an immediate health, welfare and safety hazard to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 28, 2023 inspection of MARBELLA OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of MARBELLA OROVILLE on November 28, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to MARBELLA OROVILLE on November 28, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87705(a)(c)(4) Care of Persons with Dementia (a) This section applies to licensees who accept or retain residents diagno..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.