Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 0450027731 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the investigation it was determined that there was sufficient evidence to Substantiate that facility staff were not wearing masks appropriately. LPA's Keane and Valencia entered the facility on 8/27/21 at 12:30 p.m. and waited for approximately (5) five minutes for an employee to screen them. After about (5) five minutes, LPA's screened themselves. While LPA's were screening they observed an office with an open door and (2) two people sitting at a desk. One person was wearing a mask and the other, identified by AD as the Human Resources person was wearing a mask under her nose. LPA's toured the facility with AD, where LPA's observed another office with an open door and a person sitting behind the desk with a mask under her chin. LPA's went to AD's office after touring the facility and AD admitted that staff do not wear masks appropriately and need constant reminders about this issue. LPA received the LIC 808 (Mitigation Plan) from AD on 5/24/2021. LPA reviewed the LIC 808 and on page 13, the mitigation plan it states; "All facility staff are wearing a face covering while on the premises." Facility is not following the mitigation plan that was submitted to Licensing. Based on the evidence obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore , the allegation is found to be Substantiated. California code of Regulations (Title 22) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal rights were provided and exit interview conducted.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87470(c)(1)(F)Type A

    87470(c)(1)(F) Infection Control Requirements: An Infection Control Plan shall be developed by the licensee and shall be included in the Plan of Operation required by Section 87208. The Infection Control Plan shall include all of the following: Staff shall demonstrate knowledge of and skill in infection control... This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: LPA's interviews and observations. Staff did not follow infection control requirements as required. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 7, 2022 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on March 7, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on March 7, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87470(c)(1)(F) Infection Control Requirements: An Infection Control Plan shall be developed by the licensee and shall be..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.