Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 0450027733 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

A medical professional's orders were not followed (Resident 1) . During the investigative process, five staff persons and other persons were interviewed. Two staff persons that were working during the time of the incident, were not available for an interview. Numerous documents were obtained to include Physician’s Report, Admission Agreement, Medications List, Resident Roster, Death Report, Incident Report, Staff Roster, Police Reports and Fire Department Reports. During the interview process, it was reported that on 03/23/22, a medical professional verbally gave an order to a staff person to contact her, to advise if her patient/resident had any type of change or decline in his health. During the course of the conversation, the staff person did not advise the medical professional that the resident had been sick for several days prior, as the staff person indicated that she had been off of work for those few days and was not aware of the resident’s decline in health. It was reported that the resident had been ill for a few days and on 03/24/22, at approximately 0300 hours, staff observed that the resident had black dark liquid vomit and diarrhea. Two staff persons were on shift; however, neither of them called Emergency Services (911) to have the resident examined. It was stated that in the morning at approximately 0630 hours, the resident was dressed and coming down the hallway when he collapsed, continued to vomit black dark liquid, became unconscious and died. The facility staff are responsible to notify the resident’s physician when a resident’s mental or physical health changes. Although the staff person acknowledged that she received the verbal order, other staff persons working, were not informed of the verbal order, and no one notified the medical professional of the resident’s decline in health. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed. Staff did not seek timely medical attention (Resident 1) . During the investigative process, seven staff persons, other persons and two residents were interviewed. Numerous documents were obtained to include Physician’s Report, Admission Agreement, Medications List, Resident Roster, Death Report, Incident Report, Staff Roster, Police Reports and Fire Department Reports. It was reported that the resident had been ill for a few days with the flu and on 03/24/22, at approximately 0300 hours, staff observed that the resident had black dark liquid vomit and diarrhea. There were two staff persons on shift; however, neither of them called Emergency Services (911) to have the resident examined. It was stated that it was the responsibility of the lead medication technician that should have called 911. When the medication technician did not call, the backup care provider should have called 911; however, she stated that that it was the responsibility of the medication technician. Neither staff persons contacted 911 and did not seek timely medical attention. It was stated that in the morning, at approximately 0630 hours, the resident was coming down the hallway when he collapsed, continued to vomit black dark liquid, became unconscious, and died. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed. In addition, civil penalties in the amount of $500.00 are assessed today for a resident sustaining a serious bodily injury while in care. Per Welfare and Institutions Code § 15610.67 defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation.” The facility is being advised that under H&S Code §1568.0822(f) the issuance of an Enhanced Civil Penalty (ECP) is currently under review and may be assessed later, due to a resident sustaining (as defined above) serious bodily injury while in care of the facility. continued Medication Dosage is Inaccurate (Resident 1) . During the investigative process, five staff persons and other persons were interviewed. Two staff persons that were working during the time of the allegation were not available for an interview. Numerous documents were obtained to include Physician’s Report, Admission Agreement, Medications List, Resident Roster and Staff Roster. It was reported that on 11/02/21, a resident’s medication of Losartan Potassium was increased from 1 tablet to 1.5 tablets. In March 2022, it was documented that the resident was only receiving 1 tablet of Losartan Potassium, rather than the prescribed order of 1.5 tablets. Records indicated that the error was corrected on 03/15/22. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due dates; civil penalties may be assessed.

Citations

6 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87217(b)Type B

    Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables - Every facility shall take appropriate measures to safeguard residents' cash resources, personal property and valuables which have been entrusted to the licensee or facility staff. The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by interviews and record reviews in that when the resident left the facility, she did not receive all of her belongings. This poses a potential risk to resident’s in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    Basic Services - Basic services shall at a minimum include: Regular observation of the resident's physical and mental condition, as specified in Section 87466, Observation of the Resident. The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by interviews and records review in that it was documented in several places that the resident needed assistance and supervision when walking. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(1)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Dental Care - The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by interviews and record reviews in that a staff person working the nighttime shift did not contact Emergency Services (911) when a resident fell and sustained a large skin tear on her arm. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(5)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Dental Care - Facility staff, except those authorized by law, shall not administer injections, but staff designated by the licensee may assist persons with self-administration as needed. The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by documentation that reflects an order change; however, was not followed. This poses an immediate risk to residents.

  • 87465(g)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Dental Care - The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). The licensee did not ensure that staff persons called 911 during an incident that caused an imminent threat to the resident’s health. This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents.

  • 87466Type A

    Observation of a resident - When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. The licensee did not ensure that a resident’s medical professional was notified of a resident’s health change.This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 9, 2022 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on August 9, 2022. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on August 9, 2022?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (3 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Safeguards for Resident Cash, Personal Property, and Valuables - Every facility shall take appropriate measures to safeg..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.