Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 045002773
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Resident’s hygiene needs were not being met . During the investigation, the administrator, five staff persons and the resident were interviewed. Documents obtained for the investigation included Physician’s Report, Care Report, Shower Scheduling, Residence/Care Agreement and staffing names with telephone numbers. During the interview process, it was reported and documented that the resident (Resident 1) was scheduled to have showering three times per week. Staff indicated that at times, the resident would refuse to shower three times per week, which was the resident’s prerogative. Overall, it was reported that the resident was showering two times per week. It was stated that the resident is now on a showering schedule twice per week, with the resident’s permission. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are Unsubstantiated . Facility staff does not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care . On 07/13/22, the department received two complaint allegations on the same day with regard to the temperature inside the facility. On 07/15/22, Jaclyn Avila, LPA went to the facility and stated that the department conducted an investigation into the above listed allegation and found it to be substantiated. During an on site visit the department utilized an infrared thermometer gun and found that the temperature in room #4 at 3:55 PM to be 88 degrees F. Laundry room was 94 degrees F, Kitchen was 94 degrees F, Room #8 was 88 degrees F at 4:29 PM. During the inspection residents complained of the heat. Outside weather at this time was 100 degrees F. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation(s) is found to be Substantiated . However, due to the same two complaint allegations received on the same day, and since the facility has been cited previously by LPA Avila, the facility will not be cited again.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Maintenance and Operation - The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times…The licensee did not ensure that this requirement was met as evidenced by observations. Large stains were noted on the carpeted floors and liquid was observed on the laminate floors.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 10, 2023 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on January 10, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on January 10, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.