Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 045002773
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 Staff do not follow reporting requirements. - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that the administrator did not report an outbreak of Covid 19 to licensing or public health. On 07/07/2025 LPA received a report from Executive Director reporting 3 residents and 2 staff had tested positive for Covid 19. ED confirmed outbreak had been reported to Butte County Public Health. ED stated that first staff tested positive on 06/23/2025, the first resident tested positive on 07/01/2025, the second staff tested positive on 07/05/2025. According to Butte County Public Health it is not considered an outbreak until three or more people test positive for Covid 19. This threshold was reached on 07/05/2025 and the facility reported to CCLD on 07/07/2025. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Staff did not obtain medical care for resident in a timely manner. - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that a resident had fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and lethargy symptoms for 3 days before being sent to hospital where they tested positive for Covid 19. LPA reviewed the following incident reports: 06/30/2025 A resident was sent to hospital for diarrhea and vomiting. 07/04/2025 A resident was having a hard time walking, complained of hip pain and was sent to hospital for observation. Both of these residents were diagnosed with Covid 19. During staff interviews it was learned that the first positive resident was sent to the hospital on 06/30/2025 due to diarrhea, vomiting and fatigue. Stated this resident had not been feeling well but initially refused to be sent out. The second positive resident was sent out to hospital because they were not at baseline. This resident was diagnosed and treated for UTI. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Page 3 Staff do not follow infection control guidelines.- UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that the facility is not following infection control guidelines and residents are not being isolated during a Covid 19 outbreak. LPA reviewed incident report dated 07/07/2025 that states the facility implemented their infection control plan on 07/01/2025 when the first resident tested positive. Report states facility implemented masks in the building, PPE stations, isolation of any resident or employee who has tested positive for 5 days or until symptoms pass, increased sanitization. Staff stated when they found out there was Covid in the building they started to clean more starting the first week of July, but no staff or residents were tested. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Executive Director Stacey Baxter.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(c)(6)Type B

    87411 (c)(6) Personnel Requirements – General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69. (6) The licensee shall maintain documentation pertaining to staff training in the personnel records, as specified in Section 87412(c)(2). For on-the-job training, documentation shall consist of a statement or notation, made by the trainer, of the content covered in the training. Each item of documentation shall include a notation that indicates which of the criteria of Section 87411(c)(3) is met by the trainer. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA record review the licensee failed to document that Staff 1 (S1) had completed training before being allowed to dispense medications which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 14, 2025 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on August 14, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on August 14, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.