Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 045002773
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 Staff did not allow resident to seek medical attention. - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that a resident who was not feeling well wanted to go to the hospital and staff did not arrange for the resident to go to the hospital. LPA reviewed care plan for Resident 1 (R1) which states that R1 is on hospice. The care plan states the supervisor will contact the hospice RN manager and the responsible party as needed. In case of emergencies not related to hospice care (e.g., severe bleeding or injury), staff are to call 911, notify hospice, and inform the responsible party. The Emergency Protocol states that staff will contact hospice for any issues related to the resident’s hospice care. ED stated Resident 1 (R1) is on hospice and the hospice nurse would be called if R1 was not feeling well. Any time the facility has tried to send R1 out to the hospital they have refused to go. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Licensee does not ensure staff are receive adequate training.- UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported staff are not properly trained in how to assist a resident with a transfer from a wheelchair to the bed LPA reviewed the “New Hire Training Check-Off Sheet” which documents the initial training topics that all new hires undergo when they start working at the facility. Topics include Mobility & Safe Transfers and Bending and Lifting Techniques. ED stated new staff have 20 hours of video training before they start working with residents and they get an additional 20 hours hands on training and shadowing. This training is documented. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Page 3 Facility is not following a resident’s care plan. - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported staff do not maintain record of resident’s bowel movements. LPA reviewed care tracking sheets for two residents for the month of October 2025. The tracking sheets document bowel movements on all days of the month for all shifts. Both tracking sheets are filled out correctly for both residents. ED stated this is part of each resident’s care plan and staff chart it daily This allegation is unsubstantiated. This agency has investigated the above allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to administrator Stacey Baxter.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87213Type A

    87213 Finances The licensee shall have a financial plan that conforms to the requirements of Section 87155, Application for License, and that assures sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents; shall maintain adequate financial records; and shall submit such financial reports as may be required upon the written request of the licensing agency. Such request shall explain the need for disclosure. The licensing agency reserves the right to reject any financial report and to request additional information or examination including interim financial statements. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on LPA record review the facility did not pay their PGE bill which resulted in PGE serving a FINAL NOTICE BEFORE DISCONNECTION. The facility currently has a past due amount of $4,481.00 that is due by 12/23/2025. LPA reviewed past due invoices from multiple vendors who have not been paid by the licensee. This poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 18, 2025 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on December 18, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on December 18, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.