Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 0450027732 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

01/16/2026 10:30 AM Licensing Program Analyst Rebecca Knight conducted an unannounced case management visit and met with administrator Editha McCullogh. Today’s visit is regarding an incident that occurred on 01/09/2026 and was reported to licensing on 01/12/2026. It was reported that on 01/09/2026 6:53 PM Resident 1 (r1) was found outside by Med Tech who noted that the front door had not been properly closed. R1was discovered sitting in their wheelchair in the parking lot's ditch but was unharmed. Resident Care Coordinator was immediately informed, and resident's POA, was notified. R1 was placed on 30-minute checks and routine checks are being conducted to ensure the front lobby door is latched at all times. During the course of the investigation, it was learned that another resident had been transported back to the facility from hospital and staff were called at 6:52 PM to retrieve this resident. The transportation driver informed staff that they saw a wheelchair outside and staff found R1 sitting in their wheelchair. Staff had last seen R1 inside of the facility at 6:30 PM. Continued on LIC809-C During LPA’s tour of the facility on 01/15/2025 LPA observed that the interior door with key pad entrance was malfunctioning. When staff entered the code the door opened and dis-alarmed. When staff let go of the door LPA observed that the door did not automatically close and latch though the keypad read that the door was secured. This is likely how R1 was able to enter the facility lobby through the unlatched door. Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to R1 to prevent them from exiting the secured door to the lobby and exiting the exterior lobby door at night which adversely affects the health and safety of R1 due to darkness and street traffic in the area. Based on interviews and evidence obtained during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC809D. Appeal rights were provided. Exit interview was conducted and the report was provided to the administrator.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type A

    87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed that the interior door with key pad entrance was malfunctioning. When staff entered the code the door opened and dis-alarmed. When staff let go of the door LPA observed that the door did not automatically close though the keypad read that the door was secured. This is likely how R1 was able to enter the facility lobby through the unlatched door.This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87411Type A

    87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 24 residents was not able elope from the facility out into the street at night where they were found in their wheelchair in a parking lot ditch. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 15, 2026 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a other inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on January 15, 2026. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on January 15, 2026?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Mainte..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.