Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF OROVILLELicense 045002773
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensee is not adhering to facility admission agreement. - UNSUBSTANTIATED It was reported that the licensee is charging an additional two weeks’ rent after a resident is no longer residing in the community, even after a resident’s belongings have been moved from the room. During interviews there was one resident’s family that was identified as possibly not receiving the refund they were due after the resident passed away. LPA reviewed the admission agreement, monthly invoice and two credits that were issued to the resident’s family. There was no evidence that the facility has been charging residents for two additional weeks after they move out or have passed away. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to Executive Director Grace Hawkins.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type A

    87468.1 (a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews it was determined that Staff 1 (S1) sprayed R1 with Febreze which violates R1’s personal rights. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 12, 2026 inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF OROVILLE on March 12, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF OROVILLE on March 12, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.