Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF GARDENSLicense 0450027752 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 06/30/24 the resident was transported to the hospital. It was reported that R1 was diagnosed with 3 rd degree burns on the posterior left leg and posterior right leg, hypotensive dehydrated, hypothermic, and heat stroke/heat exhaustion. It was reported that the resident needed a higher level of care and was sent to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). While at the SNF, it was determined that the resident needed a higher level of care and was sent to a medical center for observation and treatment. On 07/13/24 the resident was transported to the medical center. There is where it was reported that the resident was suffering from burns to her posterior buttocks, thighs, and legs. UC Davis documents state that the resident had approximately 9% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) to the left posterior leg and right lower posterior leg due to a scald burn of the resident laying on the concrete. On 09/19/24 the R1 was seen by the physician who reported that R1 was being seen for burns to the right leg and a burn to the left leg. In addition, the physician’s notes state that the resident has a “Necrotic tendon/tissue with necrotic tendon unattached distally…” The resident suffered from dead tissue/tendon that couldn’t be saved due to a lack of blood flow, or devascularization . A video was reviewed by LPA Gurriere of the dead tendon. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed. At the time of the complaint visit, an immediate civil penalty of $1000 shall be assessed for a violation of California Code of Regulations Personnel Requirements - 87411(a) cited on 07/10/24 and 10/29/24. At this time, the issuance of an additional civil penalty is still being determined and the Administrator has been informed that an additional civil penalty may be assessed, at a later date, based on Health and Safety Code §1569.49. Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid . During the interview process, attempts were made to talk to the 11 staff persons that may have been present during an incident; however, most of the staff have resigned from their positions, calls were not returned, or staff were working a separate shift. Resident documents were received and reviewed to include the Physician’s Report, Facility Observation Notes, and Incident Reports. In addition, records were collected from Enloe Medical Center, UC Davis Hospital, photos/videos, and a report from the resident’s physician. During the investigation and records reviewed, Enloe Medical Center reported that the resident suffered “3 rd degree burns on her posterior left leg and posterior right leg, hypotensive dehydrated, hypothermic and heat stroke/heat exhaustion.” Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the facility representative listed above and an exit interview was conducted. If any of the cited deficiencies are not corrected by the noted due date, civil penalties may be assessed.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Personnel Requirements – Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. The requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review, the licensee did not provide adequate care and supervision by leaving a dementia resident unsupervised outside for an extended period which poses an immediate Health, Safety, Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87705(c)(3)(A)Type A

    Care of Persons with Dementia – Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: In addition to the on-the-job training requirements in Section 87411(d), staff who provide direct care to residents with dementia shall receive the following training as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance: Dementia care including, but not limited to, knowledge about hydration, skin care, communication, therapeutic activities, behavioral challenges, the environment, and assisting with activities of daily living. Based on record review, the licensee did not provide adequate care and supervision by leaving a dementia resident unsupervised outside for an extended period which poses an immediate Health, Safety, Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 29, 2024 inspection of ROSELEAF GARDENS?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF GARDENS on October 29, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF GARDENS on October 29, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personnel Requirements – Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the se..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.