Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROSELEAF GARDENSLicense 0450027754 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the investigation process, and review of the resident’s (Resident 1) observation log, it was reported that on 01/15/25, 01/18/25 and 01/20/25, the resident was complaining of shoulder pain. Staff reported that they advised upper management of the resident’s pain, which was their protocol to have the resident sent out by emergency services. The management did not send the resident out until 01/21/25, which was six days later. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard have been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Facility staff did not report change in condition to authorized representative . During the interview process, the administrator and seven staff persons were interviewed. Documents were obtained to include resident observations, resident roster, Physician’s Report, Individual Service Plan, Resident’s Quarterly Report and staff names and cell numbers. During the investigation process, it was reported that the resident’s (Resident 1) responsible party was not notified of the initial complaint of the resident’s shoulder pain. It was reported that it was at least six days later before the responsible party was notified. The regulations state that when changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard have been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard have been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. The contents of this page has been removed, see LIC 9099 dated 03/25/25. Facility staff do not meet the needs of residents in care . During the interview process, the administrator and seven staff persons were interviewed. Documents were obtained to include resident observations, resident roster, Physician’s Report, Individual Service Plan, Resident’s Quarterly Report and staff names and cell numbers. During the investigation process, nearly all staff reported that staff are not meeting the needs of residents in care. It was stated that generally there are two care providers and one medication technician for 30 plus residents. It was reported that frequently a staff person will “call out” meaning not come to work, which then leaves one care provider and one medication technician to take care of 30 plus dementia residents. Staff reported that it is impossible to ensure that all residents are showered on their scheduled shower day and that their needs are not being met. Part of the allegation included that the resident’s were not seeing a podiatrist. The administrator provided documentation that a person from a clinic comes to the facility quarterly to provide care for the resident’s podiatry needs. The document indicated that approximately 10 residents received services on 01/20/25. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard have been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Facility is malodorous . During the interview process, the administrator and seven staff persons were interviewed. Documents were obtained to include resident observations, resident roster, Physician’s Report, Individual Service Plan, Resident’s Quarterly Report and staff names and cell numbers. During the investigation process, it was reported that residents use the common area toilets and that at times the toilets do get clogged and that there is an odor. Staff stated that sometimes resident’s put in too much paper products and this is part of the reason that the toilets clog up. Staff reported that they are responsible for unclogging the toilets as soon as they can. The administrator reported that if there is a problem that cannot be fixed by the staff, she will call a plumber. It was reported that when the toilets are plugged, it may cause a foul odor.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Maintenance and Operation - The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee/administrator did not ensure that the facility was without clogged toilets and an odor throughout the facility. This poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    87464 Basic Services - A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal specified in Section 87457, Pre-admission Appraisal and providing the other basic services specified below, either directly or through outside resources. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and a review of the resident’s observation log the licensee/administrator did not send the resident out for emergency services. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87464(f)Type B

    Basic Services - Basic services shall at a minimum include: Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code Section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and a review of the records, the licensee/administrator did not ensure that residents were receiving their showers as required. This poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87466Type A

    Observation of the Resident - The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and a review of the resident’s observation log the licensee/administrator did not notify the resident’s responsible party, as required. This poses a immediate risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 18, 2025 inspection of ROSELEAF GARDENS?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSELEAF GARDENS on March 18, 2025. 4 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ROSELEAF GARDENS on March 18, 2025?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (2 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Maintenance and Operation - The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance sh..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.