Complaint·August 15, 2025

Continued from LIC9099. stated during interview that R1 issued a 30-day eviction notice on January 15, 2025, however, the reason for the eviction notice was for a camera and not payment. S1 stated R1 was evicted due to the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) being revoked by the agency and the facility could not take R1 back. LPA reviewed an email between S1 and Morga Post Acute staff dated May 30, 2025, which indicated S1 stated R1 would not be able to return to the facility. S1 also stated the facility was supposed to perform an assessment on R1 to return, but when the information regarding the ALW was received S1 contacted the Skilled nursing facility (SKNF) and advised the staff that R1 will not be accepted back to the facility. Review of Moraga Post Acute notes indicated post acute staff called S1 and was informed the ALW agency stated disenrollment for R1 was effective 4/19/2025. Lastly, S1 stated there wasn’t any contact with R1 to advise R1 will not return. R1 was told by a SKNF staff member. Based on interviews and record review the facility did not follow the eviction process; therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Based on interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided. Continued from LIC9099. complaints. The LPA spoke with eleven (11) staff. Five (5) of the eleven (11) stated that they had little or no contact with R1 and weren’t aware that any of the staff wanted R1 out of the facility. The other six (6) staff stated that they were not aware that the staff was retaliating or wanted R1 out of the facility. W2 stated during interview that they did not want to be involved. Based upon the information obtained during investigation. The above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.