Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MAUREEN HOUSELicense 075601490
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

interviewed S1, S2, S3, S4, and W1 (by telephone), and R2 & R6. All staff denied that R1 had been left in a soiled diaper for an extended amount of time. All staff stated that all residents need some level of incontinent care. They reported that R1 is capable of alerting staff of a need for incontinent undergarment changing, or need for assistance for toileting. All staff reported that whether or not residents alert them, they check for changing needs every 2 to 3 hours. R6 reported that she requires incontinent care and that staff check on changing needs at least 3 times a day. W1 stated that she has visited R1 on multiple occasions and that R1 was clean and dry. W1 also stated that R1 presents as happy and expresses her like for the staff. W1 also stated her knowledge that the staff check R1 regularly. W1 reported also being the case manager for another resident and that there have been no problems pertaining to incontinent care for that other resident. Allegation: Staff not meeting resident's care needs. Unsubstantiated LPA and LPM reviewed all resident files, including but not limited to the Physician's Assessments, Admission Agreements, and Needs and Services Plans. LPA and LPM interviewed S1, S2, S3, S4, and W1 (by telephone), and R2 and R6. The RP alleged that when visiting on 4/18/23, R1 was in the common areas wearing only a neglige whereby the diaper could be seen. All staff denied that any resident is allowed to walk around the home dressed inappropriately and having no knowledge of R1 walking around the home dressed only in a neglige; they also stated that R1 requires assistance while ambulating the home. R2 and R6 stated having no knowledge of this issue. W1 reported visiting the home on multiple occasions and that R1 was always clean and dressed appropriately. W1 had no knowledge of the alleged incident. No other witnesses were identified. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87618(b)(3)(B)Type B

    "...the licensee shall be permitted to accept/retain a resident who requires the use of oxygen...under the following circumstances ..."No Smoking - Oxygen in Use" signes must be posted." This requirement was not met as evidenced by incomplete signage at the front door.

  • 87618(b)(2)Type B

    "...Licensee ...permitted to accept or retain a resident who requires oxygen under the following circumstances...if oxygen administration is performed by an appropriately skilled professional." This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff assisting R1

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 5, 2023 inspection of MAUREEN HOUSE?

This was a complaint inspection of MAUREEN HOUSE on May 5, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MAUREEN HOUSE on May 5, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.