Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

AMBASSADOR CARE HOMELicense 0792005822 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff failed to observe change in resident’s condition Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, LPA conducted interviews with, reporting party (RP), authorized representative (POA) resident (R1), staff (ADM) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Staff (ADM, S1) confirmed with LPA that on 06/23/25 S1 spoke with ADM on the phone around 11AM who requested him to check on R1. S1 stated he checked on R1 and did not notice any change in condition. ADM also spoke with R1 on the phone and told POA that he sounded fine. POA stated she called R1 again and observed R1 have slurred speech and that his face was drooping. She immediately called 911 so that he can be taken to the hospital right away. R1 was taken to the hospital by paramedics and diagnosed with a stroke and urinary tract infection. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff failed to observe change in resident’s condition was found to be substantiated. Allegation: Staff failed to meet resident’s medical needs in a timely manner Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, LPA conducted interviews with, reporting party (RP), authorized representative (POA) resident (R1), staff (ADM) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. LPA interviewed RP and POA who stated that on 06/23/25 while on a Facetime call, POA observed R1 have slurred speech and that his face was drooping. POA immediately called ADM to have staff check on R1. ADM stated that staff checked on R1 around 11:15AM and that he sounded “fine”. POA stated staff did not call 911. R1 called POA again and requested for 911 because staff was not doing anything. R1 was picked up by paramedics on 06/23/25 and was admitted at the hospital with a diagnosis of a stroke and UTI. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that staff failed to meet resident’s medical need in a timely manner was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg2 Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POCs) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties . Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(e)Type B

    The licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition, as defined in Section 87101, Definitions, to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional and if applicable, other specialized care provider… This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failed to meet resident’s medical needs in a timely manner which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.

  • 87466Type B

    The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failed to observe resident’s change in condition which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 2, 2025 inspection of AMBASSADOR CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of AMBASSADOR CARE HOME on July 2, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to AMBASSADOR CARE HOME on July 2, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "The licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition, as defined..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.