Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

STONEHEDGE GUEST HOMELicense 079200820
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LIC9099-C (Page 2) Allegation: Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated On 12/09/2023 at approximately 0700 AM staff (S1) heard resident (R1) shouting for help, and S1 came to R1’s aid. S1 found R1 sitting on the floor, complaining of back pain while holding onto his hip. S1 did not observe any visible injuries on R1. S1 offered to call 911, but R1 declined and requested assistance to stand. S1 helped R1 back to bed and resumed his duties. Allegation: Staff did not seek medical care for resident in a timely manner Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated Review of R1’s medical documents, from Kaiser Permanente at Walnut Creek revealed on 12/09/23 at approximately 0330 a.m., R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall. During the night shift, S1 reported the fall to the oncoming day shift caregiver, S2, at approximately 0700 a.m. At approximately 0900 a.m., S2 informed the in-house Registered Nurse (S3) of the incident. S3 provided instructions to S2 over the phone to assess R1. S2 documented no visible marks, bruises, skin tears, or discoloration, but noted that R1 moaned in pain when moved. S3 did not instruct S2 to call 911, nor did S3 advise any additional assessment. The direction provided was to administer pain medication, monitor R1 for one hour, and, if R1’s family did not respond within two hours, arrange transport to the hospital. LIC9099-C Continued... LIC9099-C (Page 3) At approximately 0725 a.m., S2 attempted to contact R1’s family. The call went to voicemail, and a message was left requesting a return call. At approximately 1100 a.m., R1’s daughter arrived at the facility. R1 was transported to Kaiser Walnut Creek Emergency Department at approximately 1200 p.m. Documentation shows that at approximately 1400 p.m., staff were notified that R1 had sustained a hip fracture. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the Department has investigated the above allegations of “Resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff” and “Staff did not seek medical care for resident in a timely manner” and found it to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegations are unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations of resident sustained a fracture due to lack of care from staff and staff did not seek medical care for resident in a timely manner is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(3)Type B

    e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) orThis requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having S3 associated to the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 23, 2025 inspection of STONEHEDGE GUEST HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of STONEHEDGE GUEST HOME on October 23, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STONEHEDGE GUEST HOME on October 23, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.