Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SMG RESIDENTIAL CARE INCLicense 0792009272 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

ALLEGATION: Staff did not properly report an incident involving the residents INVESTIGATION FINDING: Substantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff (ADM), residents (R1, R2), reporting party (RP) and reviewed R1 & R2 documents. On 03/24/25 at 10AM, LPA interviewed reporting party (RP) who stated that R1 and R2 had a physical altercation the evening of 02/16/25 and also the next morning before breakfast in their bedroom resulting in R2 sustaining bruising in his right cheek and a cut to his nose. On 03/27/25 at 1PM, ADM confirmed with LPA that they failed to timely report the incident to Community Care Licensing (CCLD) and Ombudsman (OMB) within the required 48 hours timeline. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the department has substantiated the allegation that staff did not properly report an incident involving residents. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Continued on the next page, LIC 9099-C pg2 ALLEGATION: Staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in a physical altercation INVESTIGATION FINDING: Substantiated On 03/24/25 at 10:30AM, LPA interviewed reporting party (RP) who stated that R1 and R2 had a physical altercation on the evening of 02/16/25 resulting in R1 sustaining bruises to his face and a cut to his nose. On 03/27/25 at 1PM, LPA interviewed administrator (ADM) who stated that R1 & R2 had an argument inside their bedroom again in the morning before breakfast. ADM stated R1 punched R2 in the face which bruised his right cheek and cut his nose. On 03/27/25 at 2:35PM, R1 and R2 both confirmed with LPA that no staff redirected them when the incidents occurred inside their bedroom. ADM stated that she did not know about the incident until she noticed R2’s bruised face and cut nose the next morning during breakfast. ADM stated R2 did not want to go to the hospital to treat his nose and bruises. ADM treated him with cold compress and was offered ibuprofen which he refused. With the residents' consent, ADM moved R2 to another bedroom with another roommate to avoid reoccurrence of the incident. R1 remained in his room without any roommate. On 02/18/25, ADM stated R1 was re-evaluated by his primary care physician and was prescribed increased Olanzapine medication. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the department has substantiated the allegation that staff did not prevent the residents from engaging in a physical altercation. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)(c)Type B

    Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be reported to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency within twenty-four (24) hours as required by Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15630(b)(1). This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff’s failure to timely report incidents to Community Care Licensing (CCL) and Ombudsman which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type B

    To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff’s failure to redirect aggressive residents which posed a potential health & safety risk to residents in care

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 27, 2025 inspection of SMG RESIDENTIAL CARE INC?

This was a complaint inspection of SMG RESIDENTIAL CARE INC on March 27, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SMG RESIDENTIAL CARE INC on March 27, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Any suspected physical abuse that does not result in serious bodily injury of an elder or dependent adult shall be repor..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.