Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

DEER RIDGE COUNTRY VILLALicense 079201044
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099 Staff left resident on the commode for an extended period of time During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed residents and staff. Interview with R1 stated she placed on the commode for almost three hours. R1 stated she pressed the call button, no one came for hours. Interview with R2 indicated, when she presses the call button for assistance after using the commode, staff responds between five and ten minutes. Interviews with staff S1, S2 and S3 indicated residents who are nonverbal are checked on between five to ten minutes when on the commode. Residents who are verbal, will press the call button or call our names for assistance. S1 also stated during interview, S2 and R1 did not get along. S1 has been the mediator between the two of them over the telephone a couple of times. S2 stated she placed R1 on the commode and noticed another resident started walking towards the front door, thinking someone was ringing the doorbell, the ringing sound was coming from call button R1 pressed. Interview with S1 revealed, S1 reviewed surveillance recording and denied seeing anyone near the front door. Based on the Department’s investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . Health and Safety Code are being cited on the attached LIC809D. LPA already cited ( 87468.1 (a) (3) ) on complaint number (15-AS-20240806132429) Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D on complaint number (15-AS-20240806132429) . Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties . Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided. Continued from LIC9099A Staff mismanaged resident medication During the course of the investigation, LPA observed the medication in a locked cabinet, located in the kitchen. LPA reviewed residents R1, R3 and R5 physician’s reports and facility’s medication administration record (MAR). LPA observed medications were administered correctly. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569..269Type B

    §1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (10) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation.....This requiremnet is not met by evidenced by: Based on investigation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above resulting in R1 sustaining a scapula fracture to the left shoulder which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    87468.1 (a) (3) (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(3)To be free from punishment, humiliation...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having R1 in a soiled breifs for a long period of time which posed a potential health and safety risk and personal rights risk to persons in care

  • 87625(b)(3)Type B

    87625(b)(3) Managed Incontinence(b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions... (3)Ensuring that incontinent residents...This requiremnet is not met by evidenced by: Based on interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having R1 in a soiled bed for a long period of time which posed a potential health and safety risk and personal rights risk to persons in care

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 15, 2025 inspection of DEER RIDGE COUNTRY VILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of DEER RIDGE COUNTRY VILLA on May 15, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to DEER RIDGE COUNTRY VILLA on May 15, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.