Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

OAKMONT OF CONCORDLicense 0792010853 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not ensure that resident had required oxygen administration Investigation Finding: Substantiated On 12/10/24 at 3:30PM, staff (S1, S2) confirmed with LPA that memory care hospice resident’s (R1) oxygen machine was turned off by S2 on 10/29/24 around 6:20PM because the machine emitted intermittent screeching sounds which agitated R1. S2 also stated that he/she removed R1’s oxygen mask and then left R1’s room that day. S1 stated that she was getting ready to go home around 6:30PM when she asked S2 how R1 was doing and S2 told her that he/she turned off R1’s oxygen machine and removed her oxygen mask. S2 stated she told S2 to call the hospice care team regarding the incident and immediately went to R1, turned the oxygen machine on and placed her oxygen mask on. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegation that staff did not ensure that resident had required oxygen administration. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Allegation: Staff mismanaged resident’s medication Investigation Finding: Substantiated On 12/10/24 at 4PM, staff (S1, S2) confirmed with LPA that hospice resident’s (R1) morphine medication was administered 2 hours late on 10/29/24. S2 stated he/she gave the morphine medication to S1 around 7PM instead of 5PM because he/she was waiting for R1’s medication dosage change orders which did not arrive on time. Review of R1’s medication administration records dated 10/29/24 showed R1’s morphine medication was to be administered every 4 hours as prescribed by the hospice care team for R1’s comfort care. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegation that staff mismanaged resident’s medication. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg1 Allegation: Staff did not ensure that medication was inaccessible to others Investigation Finding: Substantiated On 12/10/24 at 4PM, staff (S1) confirmed with LPA that on 10/29/24 around 6:40PM, hospice resident’s (R1) morphine medication was left unattended on hospice resident’s (R1) side table in the presence of R1’s family members. S1 stated that she left the unopened morphine medication in R1’s room temporarily so she can take an important phone call from R1’s hospice care team for advice regarding the temporary removal of R1’s oxygen mask and oxygen machine turnoff. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegation that staff did not ensure that medication was inaccessible to others. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation was found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties . Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87633(b)(2)Type B

    A description of the services to be provided in the facility by the hospice agency including but not limited to the type and frequency of services to be provided. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to provide timely medication administration for comfort care which posed a potential health & safety risk to the hospice resident in care.

  • 87633(d)Type B

    The licensee shall ensure that the hospice care plan is current, accurately matches the services actually being provided, and that the client’s care needs are being met at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to ensure that hospice resident had required oxygen administration as prescribed by the hospice care team which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.

  • 87633(k)Type B

    The licensee shall maintain a record of dosages of medications that are centrally stored for each resident receiving hospice services in the facility… This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to safely store a controlled substance which posed a potential health & safety risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 12, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF CONCORD?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF CONCORD on December 12, 2024. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF CONCORD on December 12, 2024?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (0 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "A description of the services to be provided in the facility by the hospice agency including but not limited to the type..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.