Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY PARK AT SAN RAMONLicense 079201116
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

PG. 2 On the allegation “Facility staff neglected resident contributing to questionable death” the following was found. R1 was admitted to the facility on 4/29/2024. On 8/8/24, the facility staff took over medication administration for R1 per their responsible parties request. On 8/27/24, R1 was having chest pains and was sent to San Ramon Valley Regional Hospital. R1 was diagnosed with low potassium. R1 was treated and sent back to the facility the same day with no new orders. On 9/11/24, R1 was having trouble breathing and was sent to the hospital on 9/12/24. R1 was diagnosed with low potassium levels and bloody fluid coming from the lungs. R1 was discharged from the hospital on 9/26/24. R1 did not return to the facility and was transferred to home health care at their responsible parties home. On 9/28/24, R1 was having shortness of breath and weakness and was transported back to the hospital while in their families care. On 10/4/24, R1 was transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). On 11 /7/24, R1 was having trouble breathing while at the SNF. R1’s lungs were drained and appeared to be doing better. On 11/12/24, R1 tested positive for MRSA and went back to the hospital. R1 was placed on hospice and passed at the hospital on 11/17/24. It was alleged that Ivy Park San Ramon missed R1’s potassium medication however it could not be confirmed after a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR ) For 7/01/2024-9/26/2024. R1 was also taking medication for congestive heart failure, medications were classified as a diuretic (water pill), a common side effect is a drop in potassium level (hypokalemia). According to Mayo clinic hypokalemia is, “Low potassium a condition in which the potassium level in your bloodstream is lower than is typical. The medical term for this condition is hypokalemia”. Report continues on LIC9099-C PG. 3 R1 also had a complex past medical history with comorbidities and was taking multiple medications as prescribed. A copy of R1’s death certificate revealed R1 passed away on 11/17/2024 at JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER-WALNUT CREEK and the cause of death was listed as chronic respiratory failure and heart failure; the etiology is unknown. A causal connection could not be established between the care at the facility and R1s expiration. Therefore, the allegation “Facility staff neglected resident contributing to questionable death” is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type B

    (a)Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having adequete staffing in memory care which allowed R2 to wander into R1's room unbeknownst to staff which posed a potential personal rights violation to residents in care

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 24, 2026 inspection of IVY PARK AT SAN RAMON?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY PARK AT SAN RAMON on March 24, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT SAN RAMON on March 24, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.