Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health check

GOOD SHEPHERD OF DANVILLELicense 0792012572 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 5/14/2024 at 9:25 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez conducted a Health & Safety inspection as a result of an unusual incident report received 5/9/2024. LPA met with Caregiver, Hope Veneracion and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator later arrived. On 5/9/2024 CCLD received an unusual incident report stating that a resident (R1) left the facility unassisted and was not found in their bedroom at approximately 8:30AM when facility staff went to get them ready for the day. Danville Police department was notified and a search for R1 was conducted. Administrator stated that resident disabled the door alarm and exited through kitchen door. Administrator also stated that facility staff (S2) saw the resident last at approximately 3:45AM when the resident went to the bathroom. On 5/13/2024 resident was located and transferred to Contra Costa Regional Center. Resident is reported to have been located without any physical injuries. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the bedrooms, bathrooms, common area, kitchen, and outdoor area. Hot water temperature was measured at 111 degrees F in the hallway bathroom. 7-day of non-perishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were sufficient. Resident's medications were kept locked in the kitchen. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were observe. First-aid kit was complete. Fire extinguisher was purchased on 4/08/2024. There are no accessible bodies of water observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. Door alarms were observed and were in working order during visit. Report continues on LIC809-C LPA interviewed S1, S2, Administrator, and R2. LPA also spoke with R1's regional social worker over the phone as well as a Danville police officer. LPA obtained copies of R1's needs and services plan, as well as the police report number associated with he incident. Administrator is to fax over staff training's for review. During interview S1 stated that the kitchen door alarm was set at the end of their shift and they are unsure as to how it got turned off. S2 states that they also remember going over all door alarms with S1 and that they were set. S1 and S2 state that they are unsure if R1 would be able to reach the door alarm to disable it but that R1 observes staff closely and has attempted before to unlock other locks such as the medicine cabinet. S2 also states that they saw R1 go to the bathroom around 3:45am. During interview with R2 they stated that they did not hear R1 on the morning of elopement. R2 states that R1 has attempted to exit facility before and frequently walks around at night checking to see what doors are unlocked. R2 states that they did not hear any alarm go off on the day of elopement. During phone interview with R1's regional social worker LPA was informed that R1 has a history of elopement. Social worker states that R1 has "sneaky" behavior and has in the past been know to observe staff and use that as a means to elope or do other dangerous behaviors. Social worker stated that R1 has had psych evaluations that show that R1 is high functioning but lacks the cognitive abilities to think out the consequences of their actions. Report continues on LIC809-C During phone interview with Danville police officer LPA learned that it is estimated that R1 eloped from the facility around 6:00-7:00AM. R1 is suspected to have left in this time frame based on eye witnesses as well as an estimated walk time from facility to local bus stop. Officer advised LPA that R1 called their son who reported the call to police. Police then located R1 in Antioch and transferred R1 to a local hospital. R1 was observed to be lucid and without injury. The following Deficiencies will be cited: Adequate staffing/plan was not available to ensure that resident with elopement tendencies was properly addressed. Staff training's are not readily available for review at facility The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiencies by POC date may result in additional Civil Penalties. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs...require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on report of resident with previous elopement behavior eloping from facility the staff were not competent in how to address the behavior and prevent the resident from being missing for days.

  • 87412(g)Type B

    All personnel records shall be maintained at the facility and shall be available to the licensing agency for review.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Administrator did not have training records readily available for review upon LPA's request

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 14, 2024 inspection of GOOD SHEPHERD OF DANVILLE?

This was a other inspection of GOOD SHEPHERD OF DANVILLE on May 14, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GOOD SHEPHERD OF DANVILLE on May 14, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.