Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

OAKMONT OF NORTH FRESNOLicense 1072090363 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interview and record review of facility documentation of the incident reveal that R1 experienced a fall in the shower while being assisted by hospice aid and facility care provider. Written statements from both as well as the chart note by Med Tech include that R1’s head came in contact with the wall during a fall. The facility did not report the incident to CCLD as required. Deficiencies are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations on the attached LIC 9099-D in the areas of Personnel Requirements, Hospice Care of Terminally Ill Residents and Reporting Requirements. An exit interview was conducted and Plan of Correction was developed. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were signed and emailed to AD Hsetty@oakmontmg.com.. Based on observation, interview, and record review the Department is unable to determine if Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and basic services were provided to R2. LPA visited the facility multiple times between 9/12/23 and 12/12/23 and observed water available during and in between meals as well as residents being assisted to eat. Record review of facility chart notes and emails show that between 3/8/23 – 4/8/23 housekeeping and hands on care service was increased for R2 due to increased need. This additional care was suspended 4/8/23. Hospice records do not mention basic services not being provided. Hospice records document that R2 continued to lose weight between 10/2022 – 8/2023 related to disease process and minimal/poor food intake. Based on record review, an order was written for R2 to receive weekly routine lab work on 7/18/22. R2 was admitted to hospice 10/25/23. R2's facility and hospice records were obtained and reviewed. It is not able to be determined when or if this routine order was discontinued. Additionally, the hospice agency ordered lab work to be done 3/14/23 which was scheduled by the facility to be completed 3/20/23. The hospice agency revised that order for the lab work to be conducted sooner by a mobile service. Based on interview, record review and observation, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur. There were no citations issued An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was signed by AD and emailed to HSetty@oakmontmg.com

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)(1)(D)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports… (1) A written report shall be submitted… (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident…This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure an Incident Report was submitted to CCLD when R1 fell and hit head while receiving a shower by the wrong hospice agency and facility staff member.This poses a potential health & safety risk to persons in care

  • Resident care and supervision skills

    87411 Personnel Requirements – General(d) All personnel shall be given on the job training…training shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance: (3) Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision..., This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure supervision of R2 who exited the Dementia wing and walked out of the facility on 3/10/23. R1's whereabouts were unknown by the facility. This poses an immediate health & safety risk to persons in care.

  • Each terminal resident needs a written hospice care plan

    87633 Hospice Care of Terminally Ill Residents (a) The licensee shall be permitted... receive hospice services from a hospice agency in the facility…(4) A written hospice care plan which specifies the care, services... all hospice care plans are fully implemented by the licensee and by the hospice(s). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee did not ensure R1's hospice care plan was implemented. R1 received a shower by staff and hospice aid of the wrong agency. R1's careplan specifies a bed bath to be given. R1 sustained a fall during this shower.This poses an immediate health & safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 12, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF NORTH FRESNO?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF NORTH FRESNO on January 12, 2024. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF NORTH FRESNO on January 12, 2024?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports… (1) A written report ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.