Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Non-compliance follow-up

SONRISA VILLA INC.License 134604417
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst, David Roman arrived on February 11, 2026, for an unannounced inspection to follow up on a substantiated complaint allegation. The purpose of the visit was discussed with Licensee, Kamran Shirizi, via Teams (online meeting), who granted entry to the facility. On January 8, 2026, the Department concluded a complaint investigation regarding the following allegations: staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident (R1). The Licensee was cited for Health and Safety Code § 1569.317 Absentee Notification Plan for Missing Residents. At the time of the complaint visit on January 8, 2026, an immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued and the licensee was informed that an additional civil penalty might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49(f). The Department has concluded an analysis and has determined that a civil penalty is warranted for serious bodily injury. The Welfare and Institutions Code Section 15610.67 defines serious bodily injury as “an injury involving extreme physical pain, substantial risk of death, or protracted loss or impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or of mental faculty, or requiring medical intervention, including but not limited to, hospitalization, surgery, or physical rehabilitation. This is evidenced by facility staff not following the absentee notification plan and failing to report R1’s disappearance for an extended period of time, which resulted in a substantial risk of death of R1. (Cont. LIC809-C) Today February 11, 2026, the Department will be issuing a civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1569.49(f) for a violation that the Department constitutes as a serious bodily injury in the amount of $10,000. However, since an immediate civil penalty of $500 was previously issued on January 8, 2026, the amount of the civil penalty issued today will be $9,500. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative, a copy of the report issued, and appeal rights provided to Medtech, Galeed Quintana. Their signature on this report acknowledges receipt of the appeal rights, found on page two of LIC 421D.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87213Type A

    The licensee shall have a financial plan that conforms to the requirements of Section 87155, Application for License, and that assures sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents; shall maintain adequate financial records... This requirement was not met as evidenced by the Department's records review observation & staff interviews. The Licensee's financial plan was insufficient which posed a health & safety risk to 76 of 76 persons in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(8)Type A

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) ...residents shall have all of the following personal rights:(8) To be free from neglect, financial exploitation... This requirement was not met as evidenced by the Department's observations & interviews. The facility's mismanagement of P&I funds and record keeping posed a health & safety risk to 76 of 76 persons in care.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    87465 Incidential Medical and Dental: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed... This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records review, the facility did not assist resident with obtaining their requireed medications and posed a health risk to 15 of 76 residents in care.

  • 1569.65(c)Type B

    Increase in fee rates for elderly residents; 90 days’ written notice... If a licensee increases rates...Welfare and Institutions Code, the licensee shall meet the requirements for SSI/SSP rate increases, as prescribed by law. This requirement was not met as evidenced by the Department's observations and interviews. The Licensee attempted to increase fee rates which posed a health & safety risk for 76 of 76 persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 11, 2026 inspection of SONRISA VILLA INC.?

This was a other inspection of SONRISA VILLA INC. on February 11, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SONRISA VILLA INC. on February 11, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.