Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

..Continued Regarding the allegation staff failed to prevent residents from being inappropriately touched by another resident. RP initially stated Resident 1 informed RP that Resident 2 was inappropriately touching Resident 3, and Resident 4. RP then changed the story and stated they witnessed these incidents happen. During interviews conducted Resident 3, and Resident 4 both deny being inappropriately touched by Resident 2. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation staff handled residents in a rough manner. RP offered broad, and insufficient information regarding the incident of Staff 1 handling residents roughly. RP stated sometime in May or June 2022, Staff 1 who used to work at the facility handled the other residents in a rough manner and on an unknown date pushed a resident (Name unknown). Department of Social Services was unable to interview the resident allegedly pushed by Staff 1 as RP never provided a name during the investigation. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents. LPA Hurt interviewed 3 facility Residents who all stated they did feel safe and comfortable at the facility. The three residents interviewed stated staff is nice and treats them very well. Resident 6 stated they feel safe living at the facility and is very happy with the living situation. Resident 6 stated the caregivers, office staff, and even kitchen make the residents feel comfortable at the facility. LPA Hurt observed facility staff having positive interactions with Residents, including playing games, raffling prizes, and giving them dessert. Based on interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. ...Continued Regarding the allegation staff failed to safeguard resident's personal belonging. RP stated during interviews RP witnessed Staff 2 remove a wallet from Resident 5’s pocket and pass to another unnamed facility staff member. Resident 5 is no longer a resident at the facility and is not available to be interviewed. Facility Administrator stated Resident 5 often picked up items at the dining tables such as sugar, plastic spoons, and any items out on the table. Facility Administrator stated Resident 5 was unable to handle money, and never had a wallet. Staff 2 stated during interview they would reach into Resident 5’s pockets to remove sugar packets or any items collected and put in their pockets during mealtimes. Facility Administrator, and Staff 2’s recollection of events are identical. Based on interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation staff mismanaged resident's medication. RP stated during interviews RP does not sleep well and wants to be given meds before the usual 0400 a.m. to 0600 a.m. regularly scheduled medication pass so RP can go back to sleep. RP stated medications are being given daily but RP wants them at a specific time outside of the normal schedule, and the facility is not accommodating this request. Based on interviews conducted, documentation obtained and reviewed during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. ..Continued Regarding the allegation staff failed to meet resident's needs. LPA Hurt spoke with 3 facility residents who all stated the staff assists them with their needs, and their needs are being met. Resident 6 stated facility staff will go above and beyond to assist residents with their needs. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect. LPA Hurt interviewed 3 facility residents stated staff does treat them with dignity and respect. The three residents interviewed stated staff is nice and treats them very well. Resident 6 stated they have never witnessed facility staff being anything but respectful to the residents. Based on interviews conducted during this investigation by Department of Social Services staff this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited today Per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Ramona Eleco, and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 18, 2023 inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT BAKERSFIELD?

This was a complaint inspection of JASMIN TERRACE AT BAKERSFIELD on May 18, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to JASMIN TERRACE AT BAKERSFIELD on May 18, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.