Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and conducted interviews and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Beatriz Ponce and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Administrator, staff and residents were interviewed and denied that drugs were used at the facility. Observation reveled some residents room did contain odor of drugs and interviews reveled resident’s family members complained of odor of drugs coming from resident rooms. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General: Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care... The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility failed to prevent R1 from engaging in non-consensual sexual relations with other residents.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 30, 2022 inspection of REDWOOD SENIOR LIVING BAKERSFIELD?

This was a complaint inspection of REDWOOD SENIOR LIVING BAKERSFIELD on December 30, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to REDWOOD SENIOR LIVING BAKERSFIELD on December 30, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.