Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Complaint

HALLMARK OF BAKERSFIELDLicense 1572093041 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Duarte and L. Xiong conducted an unnounced complaint investigation visit to the facility. During the course of this complaint investigation LPAs interviewed staff on duty and residents. LPAs obtained and reviewed facility records. It was determined based on the interviews and records review that the above allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. The evidence from the investigation indicated that a report was not generated and sent to licensing for an incident that occurred on 11/18/25. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.”

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)Type B

    Report specified resident events within seven days

    87211 Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. This requirement was not met as evidenced by observation and interviews, R1 had a fall on 11/18/2025, and was not reported to the responsible party and licensing.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 18, 2025 inspection of HALLMARK OF BAKERSFIELD?

This was a complaint inspection of HALLMARK OF BAKERSFIELD on December 18, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to HALLMARK OF BAKERSFIELD on December 18, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211 Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may r..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.