Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 09/16/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to conduct initial complaint investigation and deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Administrator Wendy Lee and Lead Medication technician Elizabeth Eisenhauer. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, facility was toured, and copies of records were obtained. R1 tested positive for TB and placed on quarantine. Facility had infection control procedure was in placed. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to the Administrator, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this report.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(2)Type A

    Based on records reviewed, interview conducted and observation, S2 is working providing care for residents. S2 is fingerprinted cleared who is not associated to facility, which poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of the residents.

  • 87411(f)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA reviewed and A1 confirmed S1 and S2’s files and observed no health screening were on file, which poses a potential health or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87633(b)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA review R1’s file, whose currently receiving hospice care with no hospice care plan on file, which poses a potential health or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.185(e)Type B

    The facility annual fee is overdue with a past due amount of $1,485.00, this poses potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87609(b)(4)Type B

    Based on record review and interview conducted, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when LPA review R2’s file, whose currently receiving home health with no home health records and care plan on file, which poses a potential health or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 16, 2025 inspection of KERN VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING FOR SENIORS?

This was a complaint inspection of KERN VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING FOR SENIORS on September 16, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KERN VILLAGE ASSISTED LIVING FOR SENIORS on September 16, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.