Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

MIKO INNLicense 1916012393 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 06072021 at 0943a Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Agard conducted an unannounced required annual visit with a primary focus on Infection Control measures using the new CARE Inspection Tools. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Agard conducted a risk assessment at the front door. Based on the assessment, the facility is clear of Covid-19 infection. LPA verified that the facility has an approved mitigation plan report. The facility is licensed for six (6) non-ambulatory residents and an approved hospice waiver for one (1) resident. Currently, there are two (2) hospice residents present during today’s visit. LPA met with the Caregiver, Rosana Tan and both toured the inside and outside grounds of the facility. LPA was not properly screened for Covid-19 symptoms nor was temperature checked. LPA was properly equipped with Fit tested N-95 and gloves. During the tour, LPA observed the facility’s infection control practices. LPA observed a sanitizing station at the facility entrance; visitors log with Covid-19 screening and temperature log. PPE supplies are readily available to staff, and an additional 30-day supply of PPE is stored in a storage room; sufficient paper, cleaning, and disinfecting supplies were observed. The facility’s designated visitation area is the back patio or front living room. LPA observed staff maintaining 6 feet physical distancing, and each person wears a face covering. LPA observed required postings throughout the facility. LPA was unable to review the facility’s surveillance testing records. According to Administrator, staff are vaccinated and are no longer being covid tested weekly. Staff have not been fit tested for N95. Covid-19 Infection Control and Prevention training records were not available to LPA. In-service training on the approved mitigation plan were not reviewed. LPA did not observe newly admitted residents or newly hired staff. All six residents with memory care needs. All rooms were inspected. Each resident has their own individual room. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition, adequate lighting provided, storage for resident personal belongings was observed. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Resident bathrooms were checked, sufficient liquid soap and towels were observed. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, the shower was free of mold/mildew. The water temperature measured at 117 F. A comfortable temperature was maintained in the facility. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of non-perishable food. Knives were observed unlocked in storage cabinet. Centrally stored medications were observed stored in their originally received containers and kept safe and locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The First Aid kit was available. One fire extinguisher was observed in a box in the corner of kitchen area. Outside grounds were toured, and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. Overall facility was a bit cluttered. Doorways were free of obstructions. The following deficiencies were cited: 1) Facility is approved from 1 hospice resident. Facility currently has 2 residents on hospice. 2) Back right stove burner not working. 3) Knives and other sharp items were unlocked The following technical violations were issued: 1) LPA was not screened for covid symptoms upon entry. 2) No N-95 fit testing completed 3) No training for donning and doffing of PPE’s 4) No surveillance testing being conducted. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Licensee/Administrator.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    Maintain facility in clean, safe, sanitary condition

    Based on [(observation) LPA observed one burner on the stove was non-operational, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87633(a)(2)Type B

    Based on [(observation) (interview) and record review, Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly, and with all terms and conditions of the waiver. LPA observed that the facilty was granted a hospice waiver for 1 residents & currently has 2 hospice residentswhich poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Notify agency before locking doors or gates

    Based on observation LPAs observed a sharp item in kitchen unlocked which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 7, 2021 inspection of MIKO INN?

This was an inspection of MIKO INN on June 7, 2021. 3 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MIKO INN on June 7, 2021?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (1 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on [(observation) LPA observed one burner on the stove was non-operational, which poses/posed a potential health, ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an inspection. Inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.