Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CANTERBURY, THELicense 1916037741 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following. For Allegation – Staff did not ensure the elevator was working properly. Interviews with S#1 – S#5, communicated that the elevator in building A does break down but they fix it right away. It’s broken down a couple times in the past 6 months. Interview with S#2 communicated that the elevator in building A has broken down 5 times in the last six months. The 1 st time was in January of 2023, it’s only normal wear and tear. In June 2023, the sensors of the doors sensed a problem and it shut the elevator down. They have a company that comes and repairs the elevator. They fixed the sensor of the elevator doors and now it works properly. The facility makes sure the company comes right away to fix it; the elevator doesn’t stay broken down too long this past time it was fixed in 4 hours. Interviews with R#1 – R#6, communicated that the elevator has been breaking down. Sometimes they notice the elevator broken down and most of the time the facility let’s them know the elevator is not working and they are repairing it. They usually don’t take long to repair it but does pose a problem when it’s not working like they miss appointment, meeting, and going out. Unfortunately, they cannot use the stairs, so they just stay in their rooms until it gets fixed. LPA reviewed the repair invoices for the elevator in building A, they have come out 5x in the last 6 months to repair the elevator. The interviews conducted and records review did concur with the above allegation. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. A ccording to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiency and issued a citation. An exit interview was conducted with Dave Hone, Executive Director, and a hard copy of report was provided along with the Appeal Rights.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type A

    87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times....This was not met as evidence. Based on elevator broke down for 4 hours and then fixed. Which poses a potential risk for persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 14, 2023 inspection of CANTERBURY, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of CANTERBURY, THE on July 14, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CANTERBURY, THE on July 14, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times....This was not met as evidence. Ba..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.