Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THELicense 1958500912 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegations: 1.) Facility staff admitted a resident beyond their level of care. 2.) Facility staff not ensuring resident's diabetic needs are met. On 07/23/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging that Resident #1 (R1) who is diabetic and requires finger prick testing twice a day to test blood sugar was admitted to the facility. The complainant is alleging that R1 does not have the capacity to perform a self-finger prick test and the facility does not have an appropriate skilled professional to perform the test, hence not meeting R1’s diabetic needs. Per record review, R1 was discharged from Kaiser Permanente Hospital and admitted to the facility on 06/08/2024. Per R1’s hospital records and discharge medication list dated 06/08/2024, R1 was to continue performing OneTouch Verio test strips with the following instructions “Check your blood sugar 2 times a day every morning before breakfast and every evening before dinner.” Per R1’s physician report dated 06/07/2024, R1’s primary diagnosis is noted as Dementia and secondary diagnosis as Diabetes. R1’s physician report also indicated that R1 is not “Able to perform own glucose testing.” During R1’s stay at the facility, R1’s blood sugar was not being tested daily. On 07/23/2024, the previous management team quit and did not leave clear instructions regarding R1’s diabetic needs to remaining staff. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 was not getting their blood sugar tested and instead, previous management was attempting to contact R1’s physician to get the blood sugar test discontinued. Additionally, the facility does not have a skilled professional to perform R1’s blood sugar test. The facility’s current ED, Trevin Willis, worked with R1’s family to find an appropriate licensed facility that can perform R1’s blood sugar test. On 08/08/2024, R1 was moved out of the facility. Based on record review and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations of “Facility staff admitted a resident beyond their level of care” and “Facility staff not ensuring resident's diabetic needs are met” are deemed Substantiated . Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were observed and cited during the visit (See 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87628(a)Type A

    87628(a) Diabetes (a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is able to perform his/her own glucose testing…, or has it administered by an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 could not perform own glucose testing and facility did not have skilled professional to perform the glucose test which posed an immediate health risk to resident in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    87464(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as facility accepted R1, who could not perform own glucose testing and facility did not have skilled professional to perform the glucose test which posed an immediate health risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 13, 2024 inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on August 13, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on August 13, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87628(a) Diabetes (a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.