Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was reported that staff handled resident in a rough manner, and that specifically Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) have been observed to handle residents roughly. The complainant alleged that either S1 or S2 grabbed a resident roughly, resulting in a skin tear. The complainant did not provide specific resident names. Interviews conducted with four (4) staff revealed that staff have not observed or heard of other staff rough-handling residents, but that there are certain staff members, Staff 3 (S3), Staff 4 (S4), and Staff 5 (S5), who are neglectful and not properly trained. Staff members have reported S3, S4, and S5 before to the previous administration, but concerns were ignored. LPAs’ interview with five (5) residents and responsible parties of residents in care revealed that no one expressed any potential or immediate concerns for staff servicing the residents at this time. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff handled resident in a rough manner” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87628(a)Type A

    87628(a) Diabetes (a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain a resident who has diabetes if the resident is able to perform his/her own glucose testing…, or has it administered by an appropriately skilled professional. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1 could not perform own glucose testing and facility did not have skilled professional to perform the glucose test which posed an immediate health risk to resident in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    87464(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as facility accepted R1, who could not perform own glucose testing and facility did not have skilled professional to perform the glucose test which posed an immediate health risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 13, 2024 inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on August 13, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on August 13, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.