Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: "resident was locked in room while in care:" The complaint alleges that Resident #1 (R1) was left alone in their room while residing at the facility. LPAs reviewed R1's admission agreement as well as R1's needs and service appraisal. Upon admission, and up until R1 had a change of condition on 08/12/2024, R1 was able to ambulate and did not require assistance with mobility. During today's visit, LPA observed the door lock/closing mechanism on 5 different resident rooms, including that of R1. All door locks observed do have the option to remain unlocked at all times or a switch can be engaged which allows the door to remain locked from the outside, but the door will open when the handle is turned from the inside. There is also the option for a resident to engage a lock from the inside, which will not allow entry to the room, but again, the resident can turn the handle which disengages the lock, and a resident can exit the room. LPA confirmed that residents can exit their individual rooms at all times, without unlocking the door or requesting staff assistance. Interview revealed that residents can choose whether they remain in their room during the day, however, staff encourage all residents to leave their rooms and engage in facility activities. Based on interview and observation, although the allegation may be valid, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegation "resident was locked in room while in care" is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: " Staff did not provide resident with meals in a timely manner:" The complaint alleges that residents are waiting up to 2 hours for meals, which resulted in R1 losing a significant amount of weight. During today's visit and during a prior visit, LPAs observed meal service to residents. Additionally, interviews were conducted related to meals and meal service. Interview revealed that kitchen staff prepare the meals in the kitchen area, then deliver prepared food to the dining room. Lunch is served beginning at 12:00PM. Salad or soup is delivered first, then meals that are to be delivered to resident rooms are set up for care staff to deliver. One care staff is able to deliver the few meals to resident rooms, while the other care staff assist residents with their meals in the dining room. Kitchen staff then bring out the main course for care staff to serve. During today's visit, LPAs observed lunch at 12:07PM. All residents had been served the salad and about half had been served the main course at that time. Dining room staff were observed returning to the kitchen to deliver additional meals for the other residents. R1, who was named in the complaint, was able to ambulate to the dining room for all meals prior to a change in condition. R1 also had a log book in their room indicating their food and beverages eaten. On 09/03/2024, R1's doctor ordered NPO (nothing by mouth) as R1 is on hospice care, so R1's food could not be observed during today's visit. Additionally, R1 had been hospitalized as of 08/12/2024 following a medical incident. When R1 returned to the facility, R1 was placed on hospice care. As R1 had a change in condition, it is unclear whether the Continued on LIC 9099-C weight loss was a result of the change in condition or whether there was insufficient food service. Based on interview, record review, and observation, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegation " Staff did not provide resident with meals in a timely manner" is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation: " Staff did not meet resident's care needs:" The complaint alleges that staff did not check on R1 timely while residing at the facility. Although interview with R1's family member revealed there was a verbal agreement indicating R1 would be checked every 30 minutes, review of R1's admission agreement revealed that there was no documented number of times staff would be checking on R1. During today's visit, LPA observed on the wall in R1's room a log indicating hourly checks for R1, which was completed in full for the September 2024 log. Staff interviewed indicate that all residents are encouraged to leave their rooms and engage in activities during the day and are therefore observed regularly. Staff indicated that residents who prefer to remain in their rooms are checked on based on their needs and service appraisal. Based on interview, record review, and observation, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore the allegation "staff did not meet resident's care needs" is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today's report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type A

    (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review, and evidence from a credible witness, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three (3) staff members did not respect a resident's dignity which poses an immediate personal rights risk for persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 4, 2024 inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on September 4, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on September 4, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.