Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged that a resident was physically abused while in care. The complainant alleged that on 10/08/2024, Resident #1 (R1) was observed to be in distress and crying while pointing to their bathroom and saying, “they beat me.” The LPA interviewed the complainant who stated that the allegation was “more a hunch than proof that was the case, [R1] simply may have been a little tired from exercising” and stated that R1 has difficulty expressing words due to history of Aphasia. The complainant also stated that no markings were observed on R1. LPA interviewed R1’s responsible party (RP) who stated they were told that R1 was screaming and saying they were beating R1 up, but RP did not observe any bruises on R1’s arms except for a small bruise on the wrist that was from a week prior. RP also stated that R1 did not used to be aggressive, but lately that has changed. According to RP, R1 gets agitated very easily, tries to exit, cries, does not like to leave the room, and thinks everyone is mean to R1. RP stated they do not see the staff being mean to R1. RP stated that R1 gets aggressive during showers and there was a particular day on 10/08/2024 where R1 had to have two (2) showers which left R1 agitated. LPA interviewed HSD Nunez and ED Weisbarth who both stated that R1 gets aggressive during showers and pinches staff and self. HSD stated that staff are trained on redirecting and de-escalating aggressive episodes and that R1’s family is aware. HSD also stated that R1 had to be removed from their second shower on 10/08/2024 for their’s the staff’s safety as R1 was having an aggressive episode and scratched staff. HSD provided LPA with a date-stamped picture taken on 10/10/2024 of the small bruise on R1’s forearm. RP confirmed that they were aware of the bruise. During the LPA’s visit on 10/17/2024, the police independently conducted a wellness check on R1 and determined that R1 has severe dementia, and the resident is safe. The LPA reviewed Resident #1’s (R1) records which confirm R1’s dementia diagnosis. Based on interviews and record review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred, therefore, the allegation “Resident was physically abused while in care” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 13, 2024 inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on November 13, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PRESERVE AT WOODLAND HILLS, THE on November 13, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.