Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Pg. 2 On 05/08/2024, from approximately 9:38am to 10:23am, Investigator Bendana conducted interviews with R1, the administrator and facility field supervisor (S1). In addition, the Investigator reviewed photographs and facility file documents related to R1. A review of the Home Health Certification & Plan of Care for R1 listed the start date as 01/21/2023. Diagnosis included zoster (shingles), heart failure and chronic pain. R1 is a fall risk with limited ambulation. R1 is forgetful at times, needs prompting under stressful or unfamiliar conditions. R1’s Physician’s Report, dated 11/06/2023, lists the primary diagnosis as mild cognitive disorder and cerebral infraction with sequelae. R1 is listed to be confused/disoriented at times, depressed but can follow instructions. R1 requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and is non-ambulatory. The Resident Appraisal for R1, dated 01/12/2024, documents R1 uses a walker and requires assistance and supervision during ambulation. R1 has periods of forgetfulness and confusion, has no interest in social activities, and is in bed most of the time. A review of the Photo/Video Consent & Release document revealed that the photographs are not made part of the resident record. Photographs are periodically taken for internal or safety purposes, such as to be shared with medical personnel. Text printouts were reviewed, dated 03/12/2024 at 1:21pm, the administrator texted R1’s resident representative regarding photo and video consent forms. The administrator explained skin checks are done weekly and photos are used to document no skin issue. The form was signed 04/03/2024 by R1’s resident representative. During the investigation, the administrator provided a printout of R1’s photographs taken. On 05/06/2024, at approximately 3:34pm hours, S1 conducted a skin check on R1. The skin check consisted of vitals. It is noted R1 had on and off pain in their legs and back. No skin breakdown noticed. Photographs of heel, feet, and bottom of both feet were taken. On 01/18/2024, at approximately 9:38am, S1 conducted a skin check on R1. The photographs are of R1’s torso and chest area affected by shingles. R1 is lifting R1’s top, nipples are not visible, R1’s face is not visible. Photograph is focused on the affected area. Continues on LIC 9099 C...pg. 3 Pg. 3 The investigation further revealed, on 05/02/2024, at 3:11pm, the Los Angeles Police Department, Van Nuys Patrol Division officers responded to the facility due to a phone call from R1. A card was left indicating a report only was taken by law enforcement. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, R1 stated they were not touched inappropriately by facility staff. R1 stated S1 conducts skin checks weekly to check for bed sores. Interviews and documents show skin checks are conducted weekly by S1. S1 asks and informs residents about photographs taken to document bed sores, shingles, or redness. The photographs taken were not sexual in nature. During the interview, R1 showed signs of confusion. Nevertheless, R1 felt safe in the facility. R1 disclosed they had previously refused photographs to be taken and S1 respected R1’s request. Documentation provided by the administrator, included a signed consent for photographs; signed by R1’s resident representative. Based on the information obtained and statements made, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff took inappropriate pictures of R1’s body. Therefore, the allegation “staff took inappropriate pictures of resident's body” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 10, 2024 inspection of COTTAGES AT THE COLONY OF SHERMAN OAKS #4?

This was a complaint inspection of COTTAGES AT THE COLONY OF SHERMAN OAKS #4 on June 10, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COTTAGES AT THE COLONY OF SHERMAN OAKS #4 on June 10, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.