Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

LOVING CARE FACILITY INC.License 1958503493 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Martha Arroyo conducted a Case Management – Deficiencies to issue citations for deficiencies observed during an unrelated complaint investigation. Entrance interview conducted. Prior to visit, LPA Peraldi printed out the facility personnel report summary from the Licensing Information System (LIS). Upon arrival, it was revealed Staff #1 (S1) is the main caregiver during the week. Per record review, conducted by LPAs on the Guardian website, S1 does not have fingerprint clearance. Inter views with the Administrator revealed that S1 started working at this facility on July 27, 2023. The Administrator explained that S1 will obtain their fingerprint clearance. The LPAs reminded the Administrator that staff that are not fingerprinted or are not associated to the facility cannot be working at the facility. The Administrator stated that the facility will ensure that all staff will have a criminal record clearance and are associated to the facility prior to working at the facility. Additionally, the LPAs had a conversation with the Administrator regarding the Unlicensed complaint that the Department received on 08/14/2023 located at the accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at the back of the facility. The Administrator stated that the ADU is not licensed and is an independent living facility and that she is not part of the operation. The Administrator explained that the Operator of the independent living facility has their own lease agreement and only accepts tenants who do not require aspects of care and supervision. Information obtained and reviewed from investigation conducted on 08/17/2023, revealed that one (1) out of three (3) tenants (Tenant #1) were found to require assistance with activities of daily living such as but not limited to medication management, bathing, and dressing. Furthermore, record review and interviews conducted revealed the Administrator misrepresented the facility by accepting a resident who required care and supervision and was placed in the independent living facility located in facility’s ADU. Continued on LIC 809-C. During the interview with the Administrator, it was revealed that one of the residents was hospitalized on July 23, 2023 and the Administrator did not send an incident report regarding the hospitalization to the Department. The LPAs reminded the Administrator that a written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events such as a hospitalization. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Civil Penalties assessed in the amount of $500. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, today's reports and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.58(2)Type A

    HSC-1569.58(2) Engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in or receiving services from the facility… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the Administrator misrepresented the facility by taking a resident needing assistance with ADLs and placing them in the independent living facility, which poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)Type B

    87211(a)(1)Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as an incident report was not submitted for a resident’s hospitalization which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87355(e)(1)Type A

    87355(e)(1) Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Healthh...all prior to working...(1) Obtain a California clearance... as required by the Department… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews conducted, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as S1 does not have a criminal record clearance which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 17, 2023 inspection of LOVING CARE FACILITY INC.?

This was a other inspection of LOVING CARE FACILITY INC. on August 17, 2023. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LOVING CARE FACILITY INC. on August 17, 2023?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "HSC-1569.58(2) Engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either an individual in ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.