complaint·October 10, 2025

Per the RP, a public agency received an eviction letter for R1 from the facility Administrator; however, the letter was not signed. Per the RP neither the R1 nor their responsible party reported that they would be evicted. The LPA interviewed R1’s responsible party, and the responsible party denied receiving an eviction letter from the facility Administrator. Per the responsible party, they had a discussion with the Administrator during the admission agreement meeting that the Administrator agreed to accept R1 for a minimum rent payment, with the agreement that a rent increase would take place after three months of the admission of R1, the responsible party accepted the agreement and signed the agreement dated on 04/07/2025. Furthermore, the party responsible stated that they have not received an eviction letter after the tree months. The responsible party stated that they were very happy with the services being provided to R1 at the facility, happy with the staff and the Administrator, and had no concerns. The interview with the Administrator revealed that they admitted R1 on 04/07/2025, after receiving a referral from LA Care. The Administrator stated that they were told that they could get additional funding from other sources to cover for the difference in fees, given that the responsible party for R1 could only pay a minimum fee, with a $3,000 difference to pay the full $5,000 dollar fee. An admission agreement and a contract document was created at the time of the admission of R1, where R1’s responsible party agreed to the conditions of the admission. Furthermore, the Administrator stated that they have been working with R1’s responsible party to get the additional funds to cover for the full rate of the stay at the facility, and that they do not plan on evicting R1. Record review revealed that in addition to the admission agreement, a Resident Responsible Party Agreement was created and was accepted and signed by R1’s responsible party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, based on the interviews, and record review there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. The Administrator was not present to sign the repot and assigned the facility's representative Melany Gabuzyan to sign the report. Interview exit was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.