Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGELicense 197603165
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC 9099 On 03/12/2024, from 9:10 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., LPAs Valeria Conway and Zabel Chochian conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. At 10:00 a.m., the LPAs conducted a physical plant tour of the facility with the Assistant Administrator to ensure there were no health and safety hazards. From 11:05 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., the LPAs conducted records review including but not limited to resident records, facility internal records and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 04/14/2024, from approximately 4:31 p.m. to 5:13 p.m., Investigator Seng conducted interviews with R1’s Resident Representative and Kaiser Permanente Clinical Social Worker; on 05/16/2024, from approximately 8:47 a.m. to 10:58 a.m., with the facility Assistant Administrator, caregivers, and residents; on 06/11/2024, from approximately 4:50 p.m. to 5:54 p.m., with caregiver and an attempted interview with R1 (R1 unable to be interviewed due to mental condition of dementia and non-verbal); and on 06/12/2024, at approximately 2:01 p.m., with Star World Home Health nurse. In addition, the investigator obtained and reviewed medical records from Kaiser Permanente, Astoria Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Grand Valley Health Care Center, and Star World Home Health, photos of R1’s pressure injury, and facility file documents related to the investigation. According to medical records reviewed, R1 was initially admitted to the Grand Valley Health Care Center (GVHCC) on 12/23/2022 for a left femoral neck fracture (hip fracture). On 01/25/2024, R1 was discharged and admitted to the Glen Park at Valley Village facility. The discharge paperwork from GVHCC did not indicate a pressure injury. However, GVHCC records reviewed indicated that on 01/11/2024, R1’s Patient Care Plan notated R1 had a pressure injury on R1 Sacro coccyx which was listed as a Stage 2. The goal was to ensure the sore was healed within 90 days. The Assistant Administrator stated R1 had no pressure injuries upon admission to the facility, however, it is unknown if a body check was completed. During R1’s file review it was noted R1’s Head to Toe Assessment form was not filled out and left blank, both in the file review and when the investigator requested to view the documents in person. Continued on LIC 9099-C Continued from LIC 9099-C R1’s diagnosis included osteoporosis of knee, myopia, difficulty with walking, diplopia, hypertension, fracture of left femur, history of falling, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, low back pain, lack of coordination, artificial left hip joint, radiculopathy of cervical region, arthritis, senile degeneration of brain, spinal stenosis of lumbar region, spondylolisthesis of lumbar region, type two diabetes, dementia, and glaucoma. A review of the Star World Home Health records revealed R1’s care with home health began on 01/30/2024, the home health nurse reported a Stage 2 pressure injury on R1’s coccyx measuring 0.3x0.2x0.2cm. A Physician’s Order from Dr. David Wong recommended a Skilled Nursing visit one time a week for 3 weeks. Dr. Wong’s order stated the following, “Skilled Nurse to perform/demonstrate and instruct patient/caregiver regarding coccyx pressure ulcer as follows: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply triad paste and leave open to air daily. Patient caregiver may perform treatment during non-Skilled Nurse visit days. Coccyx pressure ulcer will be healed with current treatment by 4 weeks. Wound will remain free from signs and symptoms of infection, or complications during the treatment period”. The administrator was made aware of and agreed to the treatment plan. The home health notes indicate by the 02/15/2024 visit, the pressure injury increased in size and progressed in size weekly thereafter. By 03/01/2024, R1 was sent to Kaiser Permanente Emergency Room (ER) for further evaluation and diagnosed with a pressure ulcer of sacrum Stage 3 with full thickness skin loss. Later that same day, R1 was discharged from Kaiser and admitted to Astoria and Nursing Rehabilitation Center to continue with wound care. R1 was diagnosed with a pressure injury of sacral region unstageable. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to prove that the facility was responsible for the neglect/lack of care and supervision causing R1 to sustain an unstageable pressure injury. Per the staff interviews, it is possible that the Star World Home Health (HH) nurse failed to properly care for R1. The staff interviews reflected that R1 was a “two-person assist;” however, the HH nurse never asked for assistance. Other staff interviews reflected that the HH nurse was only seen twice at the facility and others stated that sometimes the HH nurse would not visit R1 as the HH nurse would only discuss R1’s condition with the Assistant Administrator. The HH nurse did not provide information or documentation to support which caregivers were provided with training on R1’s wound care. Continued on LIC 9099-C Continued from LIC 9099-C The caregivers should not provide wound care given they are not skilled professionals. Based on the evidence received from staff, HH nurse interviews, and the medical records; there was insufficient evidence to prove that the allegation of neglect and lack of care and supervision of the R1’s pressure injury became worse due to staff neglect/lack of supervision. Therefore, the allegation “Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision: Resident sustained an unstageable pressure injury while in care at the facility as a result of facility neglect” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87609(b)(3)Type A

    87609(b)(3) Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies (b) Incidental medical care... (3) The licensee informs the home health agency of any duties the regulations prohibit facility staff from performing...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Facility staff performed wound care treatment to R1’s pressure injury, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87615(a)(5)Type A

    87615Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition...shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (5) Residents who depend on others to perform...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Facility admitted and retained R1 who had no capacity for self-care, without submitting an exception request for the prohibited health condition, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87631(a)(3)(B)Type A

    87631Healing Wounds(a) Except... the licensee shall be permitted... a resident who has a healing wound...(3) Residents with a stage 1 or 2 pressure injury...an appropriately skilled... (B) All aspects... documented in the resident's file.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. There were no home health logs or staff notes available for R1 at the facility, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 9, 2024 inspection of GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGE on October 9, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GLEN PARK AT VALLEY VILLAGE on October 9, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.