Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHATEAU MAGNOLIALicense 1976048091 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Nune Margaryan acting as translator in the Armenian language with R2-R 4 who were Armenian speaking. Investigation included the following: Interviews with staff, residents, family member of Resident R 1 and video of the incident inside Resident R1's room. In regards to the allegation Staff hit resident, video footage was obtained that shows Staff S 1 hitting R1 with a pillow and placing the pillow over the resident's head, calling the client an "asshole" and threatening the resident with physical restraints. Video obtained by family member of R 1 who stated that the incidents occurred between May 3 and June 1, 2022. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, the investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. In regards to the allegation Staff covered resident's face, video footage was obtained that shows Staff S 1 hitting R1 with a pillow and placing the pillow over the resident's head, calling the client an "asshole" and threatening the resident with physical restraints. Video obtained by family member of R 1 who stated that the incidents occurred between May 3 and June 1, 2022. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, the investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. In regards to the allegation Staff threatened resident with harm, video footage was obtained that shows Staff S 1 hitting R1 with a pillow and placing the pillow over the resident's head, calling the client an "asshole" and threatening the resident with physical restraints. Video obtained by family member of R 1 who stated that the incidents occurred between May 3 and June 1, 2022. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, the investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff does not ensure that COVID masking protocols are followed, LPA on facility visits 06/14/2022,10/05/2022 and today's visit 06/22/2023 observed staff wearing masks and the facility being equipped with a 90 day supply of PPE. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Staff had inappropriate interaction with a resident, interviews with staff who stated that there has not been inappropriate interactions such as massages being done by staff to residents and nothing inappropriate. Resident's R2- R 4 stated that there has not been any massages or any inappropriate interactions with staff and resident's. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. In regards to the allegation Facility smells like cigarette smoke, LPA on facility visits 06/14/2022,10/05/2022 and today's visit 06/22/2023 did not smell any cigarette smoke and did not see any cigarette buds or ashtrays at the facility. Interview with Resident's R2-R4 who all stated that no resident or staff are smoking at the facility and there has never been a smell of smoke at the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type A

    Personal Rights of Residents in All FacilitiesResidents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on video observation and interview the licensee failed to have client free from punishment, infliction of pain and humiliation by Staff S 1 calling the client an "asshole" and threatening the resident with physical restraints, and by Staff S 1 hitting R1 with a pillow and placing the pillow over R1's face which posed an Immediate Health and SafetyRisk to resident's in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87405(d)(5)Type B

    Administrator - Qualifications and DutiesThe administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply Good character and a continuing reputation of personal integrity. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Administrator was not forthright with the Department by denying knowledge of the incident and saying client left because of constipation issues and did not disclose the incident which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 22, 2023 inspection of CHATEAU MAGNOLIA?

This was a complaint inspection of CHATEAU MAGNOLIA on June 22, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CHATEAU MAGNOLIA on June 22, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personal Rights of Residents in All FacilitiesResidents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have al..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.