complaint·March 22, 2023

LPA interviewed Staff #2 (S2) at 9:10 a.m. and S1 at 9:20 a.m. Both S1 and S2 stated the key to open the locked cabinets is stored at a central location. S2 showed LPA the key at approximately 9:15 a.m. Based on observations and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Resident's door was not kept free of obstructions Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged a dresser blocked the exit path in Bedroom #5. During the 8:55 a.m. physical plant tour, LPA observed a sliding glass door in Bedroom #5 which was unlocked. The dresser which allegedly blocked the exit door in Bedroom #5 was off to the side and not obstructing an exit path. 4 out of 4 bedroom exit doors were unlocked and unobstructed. 4 out of 4 auditory alarms were on and functioning. From interviewing S2 at 9:10 a.m. it was discovered that the resident who occupied Bedroom #5 had no issues with accessing the outdoor area via the exit door. Based on observations and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.