complaint·March 21, 2022

R1 and R2 Stated that they are in a consensual friendship and are enjoying each other’s company. R2 stated that they enjoy other activities outside of R1, such as Yoga and reading. R2 and R1 both stated that R1 is not soliciting money. R1 stated that they have been encouraging R2 to become a stronger person and encouraging R2 to take back their financial freedom. Interview conducted with Residents who know R1 and R2, generally stated that they do not feel R1 isolates R2, and they have no witnessed R1 solicit funds from R2. Record Review revealed that R2 does not have any diagnosis of dementia, or mild cognitive impairment, hindering them from making decisions. Administrator stated that R1 and R2 are aware of their personal rights, and have had their own internal discussions with the residents to ensure adequate supervision is provided. Based on Interviews, Record Review and Observation. The LPA finds that Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.