Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

GOOD SHEPHERD HOMELicense 1976068363 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility is in disrepair. Interview with S1 revealed that resident bedroom #4 had a hole in the ceiling. S1 interview also revealed, that one of the walls in bathroom #1 was chipped at the bottom and bathroom vent was dirty. S1 interview further indicated, that the repairs and cleaning were completed prior to today’s visit. During visit, LPA observation indicated repairs had been completed for the hole in the ceiling and chipped wall in the bathroom and the vent in the bathroom was cleaned. Based on interview with S1 and LPA observation, the allegation is corroborated; therefore the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED . Regarding: Staff did not ensure medical services were provided. Interview with S1 revealed, an appointment for routine medical services for R1 had not been scheduled because family had not signed the declination/acceptance form which would grant or deny permission for R1 to attend the routine medical appointment. Record review conducted during visit revealed, medical appointment for R1 had not been scheduled; however, there was no documentation indicating family’s decline for a medical appointment until it was sent by family on 5/28/25 . Further record review conducted by LPA indicated, facility staff received the declination for the routine medical appointment from family last year on 12/5/24; however, the decline form for this year had not been requested from family by licensee until 5/28/25. Interview with S1 further revealed, R2’s file was missing Immunization record but review conducted by LPA at the time of visit indicated, R2’s immunization record was present in the file. Record review also showed no indication of R2 attending a dental appointment around the anniversary of last years appointment which took place on 6/24/24 or confirmation of an upcoming scheduled appointment. Licensee scheduled dental appointment for R2 at the time of visit via phone call to dental facility. Based on interview with S1 and LPA record review, the allegation is corroborated and therefore the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Continues on LIC 9099-C The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff does not ensure staff are adequately trained. Record review indicated that S1-S6 have the required job training received during initial hire and through continued education for various topics, including but not limited to Reporting and Documentation, Abuse and Neglect Reporting and Dementia Training. Records indicate staff have the initial (40) hours of training provided during orientation and are required by licensee to continue with training throughout the year. Record review further indicated, S1-S6 have certification through continued education for care and supervision for residents in their care. Record review does not corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Fidelito Ruiz, Administrator, and a copy of this report was provided during visit. Regarding allegation: Facility did not meet food service requirements. Record review and observation conducted by LPA revealed, facility's current menu plan for residents does not offer a variety of foods to meet personal preferences, special dietary needs, food habits and cultural background. Interview with S1 indicated, alternate menu had not been updated nor posted. Based on interview with S1 and LPA record review and observation, the allegation is corroborated and therefore the allegations is SUBSTANTIATED . Based on LPA’s observations, interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations noted above are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies were observed and cited per California Code of Regulation Title 22 Division 6. Refer to LIC 9099-D. Exit interview held with Fidelito Ruiz, Administrator and copy of report and Appeal Rights provided during visit.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type A

    Maintain facility in clean, safe, sanitary condition

    87303(a) Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and observation, resident bedroom #4 had a hole in the ceiling, one of the walls in bathroom #1 was chipped at the bottom and bathroom vent was dirty which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87506(b)(13)Type B

    87506(b)(13) Resident Records(b) Each resident’s record shall contain at least the following information:(13) Continuing record of any illness, injury, or medical or dental care, when it impacts the resident's ability to function or needed services. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review, licensee did not ensure that residents had the proper declination of routine medical appoinment in place and scheduled resident dental appoinment accordingly which poses a potential risk for the health and safety of residents in care.

  • 87555(b)(5)Type B

    87555 General FoodService Requirements(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (5) Meals shall consist of an appropriate variety of foods and shall be planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review, current menu plan for residents does not offer a variety of foods to meet personal preferences, special dietary needs, food habits and cultural background which poses a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 8, 2025 inspection of GOOD SHEPHERD HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of GOOD SHEPHERD HOME on July 8, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to GOOD SHEPHERD HOME on July 8, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (1 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87303(a) Maintenance and Operation(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maint..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.